This week’s fresh listings:
This page is to be updated every
Tuesday and will contain all the latest Coin,
Medal & Token listings for that particular week.
Most sold coins are now
accessible via a new link on the front (index) page category grid.
Additions to www.HistoryInCoins.com
for weeks commencing Tuesday 13th October 2026
WSax-9434: Anglo
Saxon Silver Sceatta - Kings of Northumbria, Eadberht. Regal issue, AD 737-58. York
mint. Obverse: EAdBERhTVI
around a Cross Pattée; reverse: fantastic animal (currently thought to be a
combination of a formalised lion with elements of a Celtic stag) right with
pronounced main, foreleg raised, tail up and back down - a tail which bizarrely
emanates from nearer he neck than the hind quarters! -
and a protruding tongue. There are no devices either over or under the
animal. S.R.847 var,
Abramson 70-10, class Ai. Eadberht's brother, Archbishop Ecgberht,
had been a pupil of Bede, or "the Venerable Bede" as we've come to know him today. Ecgberht founded
the school at York, a school which the famous Alcuin
left in AD 781 to become master of Charlemagne's school in Aachen. Ecgberht played a
considerable role in his brother's beneficial reign, as evidenced by coins issued
in joint names. The Northumbrian early
penny coinage is distinct from the largely uninscribed southern issues in that
it is literate and with clear legends naming historically documented monarchs
and bishops / archbishops. The joint
regal and Episcopal issues show a high degree of political organisation and
sophistication. This "fantastic
animal" issue effectively conflates Christian and Celtic imagery. The denomination suffered progressive
degradation, ultimately changing to base stycas under
Eanred, some 50 odd years on from Eadberht - this
coin is at the polar opposite end of that spectrum, it being the very first
iteration of the series and thus of excellent silver content. A remarkably chunky silver
coin (again, an illustration as to its very early issue) in excellent grade. Attractive toning and a very well centred
reverse add to the appeal, as does the uncluttered nature of said reverse. A very desirable coin - I refer collectors to
the prices achieved (remember, 30% commission was on top of those already
impressive hammer prices) at the October 7th 2026 Spink Martin J.
Waldron auction.
£775
WMH-9435: Exceptional
Henry 1st Norman Kings Hammered Silver Penny. B.M.C. I, the Autumn
of 1100 only: +HOPORD O NOTÐI - Howard of Norwich.
S.R.1263. Norwich is a reasonably rare mint for
Norman coinage although perhaps counter intuitively, Stephen has the most
recorded examples of Norwich mint coins. William 1st and Henry 1st are fairly similar
in numbers with, as expected, William II the rarest in terms of numbers. Of much greater importance is the moneyer: Howard
of Norwich is a very rare moneyer having only fifteen examples across all
types. For this very
first short-lived B.M.C. I issue, there are only three examples recorded
on the Fitzwilliam Museum's EMC database with two being cut
halves. This coin, which is not a die
duplicate of the E.M.C. coin, makes a grand total of two extant examples of
B.M.C. I Howard of Norwich pennies.
This very first issue under Henry 1st (not surprisingly) shares some
similarities with the coins of William II, albeit Henry 1st coins are generally
of better lettering style and struck on larger flans. Henry 1st coin hoards are incredibly thin on
the ground, no pun intended, highlighting the rarity of the coinage. In the absence of any recent or even near
recent Henry 1st coin hoard, the go-to hoard for academics and numismatists
alike is the Shillington Hoard of 1871, and that was predominantly William II
with only thirty odd Henry 1st coins in situ.
Bizarrely, those thirty coins were middle reign and not the very first
issues, the theory being that the Henry 1st coins were added to the hoard some
eighteen years after the William II coins were deposited. The Henry 1st contingent was deposited c.1113
which accounts for there being nothing earlier than B.M.C. 8 issues. In summary, this is the very first Henry
B.M.C. I issue - which is rare in itself - added to the rarity of the mint
coupled with the even greater rarity of the moneyer, not forgetting the
excellent grade, toning and problem-free nature of this coin, makes this a very
rare, important and desirable coin.
£2,995
Provenance:
ex Tim
Owen
WMH-9436: Rare
Richard II Medieval Hammered Silver Round Farthing. Type 1 with a small neat head, the neck completely missing,
recycled from an Edward III type 10 punch.
London mint only. The obverse regnal reading is +RIEARD, it
being the ONLY such reading in all thirteen obverse
dies recorded thus far. Only three reverse
dies are recorded. This coin: obverse
10, reverse a, or die combination 10/a.
This rare obverse 10 is only found with reverse die a. Interestingly, there is no chronology or
pattern in the die combinations used - for example, reverse die b occurs only
with obverse 2 and whilst reverse c does occur with high number obverse dies,
the final combination recorded is 13/a!
Weight 0.3 grams or 4.6 grains, which is actually heavier than the
average taken from eight extant specimens at 4.5 grains - there is no recorded
provenance with this particular coin but I'd hazard a guess that it formed part
of that cohort of eight coins that Withers used. S.R.1703, North -, Withers
10/a. The majority of Richard II
farthings, including the type 2 coins, were struck early in his reign, which is
perhaps not surprising considering the use of Edward III punches in Richard II
dies. Halfpennies from this reign are
fairly plentiful whist farthings are a different matter altogether - something
Coins of England touch upon in their price guide but, in my humble opinion, the
differential between halfpennies and farthings is considerably
underplayed. VF grade (please be mindful
that the coin is tiny and you are looking at a much magnified image), with good
toning and the all-important rare and desirable regnal reading of RIEARD.
£595
WJC-9437: 1630
Birth of Prince Charles Silver Medal.
The
first son of Charles 1st and Henrietta Maria; the future King Charles II.
Interestingly, Prince Charles was the first English prince born in
England entitled to bear the arms depicted on this medal - four heart-shaped
shields, united at their bases, bearing (quarterly), England, Scotland, France
and Ireland. The reverse legend backs
this up by stating: In honour of the Prince of Great Britain, France and Ireland.
There is often confusion over this with some saying Charles II was the
first English prince born in England, period. He was not.
The future Henry IV was born in Bolingbroke Castle, a place I've visited may a time,
although thinking about it, he wasn't actually born a prince! Henry VI was born Windsor Castle so definitely an English-born
prince predating Prince Charles. Eimer
115, MI(i) 253/34. Prince Charles was born 29th
May, 1630. As a teenager, he witnessed first hand the
troubled times his father endured (surprisingly, Prince Charles didn't leave
the country until late 1651), ultimately becoming king in 1660 upon the
Restoration of the Monarchy.
Anecdotally, Charles II was perhaps remembered as being as arrogant,
self-righteous, and pious as his father, and I actually think there's some truth
to that. However, as with other more
recent Royals (and I'm not referring to Andrew Mountbatten Windsor here),
Charles II played the game, knowing full well from his own experience with his
father that the throne depended on keeping the public and politicians happy. He realised early on that there were
different ways to those of his father in terms of ultimately getting your own
way. A nice piece of
British Royal memorabilia spanning one of this country's more interesting
periods of history.
£345
Provenance:
ex
Charles Edward Noble Collection
ex
Spink
WSC-9438: Alexander
III Medieval Scottish Hammered Silver Round Farthing. Second coinage of 1280 - 1286.
+ALEXANDER REX coinage with reverse SCOTORVM reverse. Tentatively Berwick mint (four
reverse mullets, each of six points), S.R.5063. The second coinage came right at the end of
Alexander's fairly lengthy reign. He
succeeded his father at the age of seven and ended it with an ill-advised night
time horse ride where he inadvertently steered both horse and king over a
cliff. Although aged just 44 when he
died, all of his three children were already dead (Margaret - died in
childbirth; Prince Alexander - died of poor health aged 19; David - died aged
8), leaving just a single grand daughter, Margaret, daughter of his own
daughter Margaret, also known as the Maid of Norway. Margaret actually did inherit the throne in
1286, aged just 3. She was destined to
marry Edward II of England to supposedly achieve a union
between the two countries. Margaret
sailed from Norway to take the throne aged 7 in 1290
but unfortunately died en route in the Orkneys, having never set foot in her
kingdom. There was no coinage of
Margaret from this period although Alexander III coinage most likely continued
to be issued, probably even after John Baliol took
the reigns. Full flan, slightly wavy,
full legends, outstanding portrait - I really can't
remember seeing a better example!
£645
Provenance:
ex
Mike Vosper (his original ticket marked at £450), sold to ...
ex Egbert Tomlinson Fort Collection (his original ticket with distinctive
signature), 1961-2021
WI-9439: 1722
William Wood's Rarer Type 1 Irish Halfpenny. Laureate bust of George 1st, right (contrary to what the
S.R. plate coin looks like [x2 reverses in error!), there is actually a proper
obverse), and most importantly, Hibernia seated, holding a harp to her left,
head turned to face the harp. This is a
very different (earlier) reverse to that which is normally seen on the 1722-4
Woods issues. S.R.6600. William Wood was a London merchant who gained a patent in
1722 for coining copper coins for both Ireland and the American Colonies. He duly struck his coinage, this type 1 being
the very short-lived first coinage, at his Bristol foundry, but at a weight of copper
that was substantially below that of regular Regal English halfpennies. This coin weighs 7.68g, which is high for
issue, whereas the English coppers had a standard weight of 9.86g. The alloy was also slightly different to the
English countermarks in that the Irish coins were much more susceptible to wear
through circulation, presumably because the copper content, whilst overall low
in weight, was higher or purer. The
Irish parliament was not happy about this weight reduction and the Irish public
and traders were even less pleased - remember, in those days a halfpenny coin
was supposed to be worth what the copper content was worth, thus a 25%
reduction in coin weight represented a coin that was worth 25% less than a
halfpenny. To put it another way, if you
wanted to buy a bag of turnips in Ireland in 1722 priced at a twopence, and you wanted to pay using four Woods 1722
halfpennies, you were actually only giving the turnip merchant coinage to the
value of one and a half pence. A boycott
of the coinage was instigated, predominantly by traders, with the charge being
that Wood was attempting to defraud the public.
In 1724, Wood was forced to stop production and surrender the patent. Perhaps a tad harsh, until you find that
William Wood, for effectively not just attempting but literally defrauding the
state and public, was granted a £3,000 a year pension as compensation. Today, that figure would be £750,000 or a
monthly "salary" of £62,500. I
think he was able to just about manage with the loss of his patent. The entire coinage was recalled from
circulation and shipped out to the American colonies to circulate alongside the
Rosa American coinage. A lovely brown
patina, approaching VF for issue (you rarely see them better) and not
forgetting the much, much rarer type I reverse.
Find a better example for sale anywhere!
£395