**** An indication as to the way
the market has moved over the last few years for Elizabeth 1st
coinage. ****
“85% of Mestrelle’s meagre
experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562.
This leaves 15% for all the other Screw-Pressed
sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings
and the gold coinage.”
Sixpences
WTH-8007: 1561 Elizabeth 1st Milled or
Machine-Pressed Silver Sixpence.
"Milled" coinage, initial mark Star, dated 1561, this being
the very first dated
Provenance:
Ex John Newman (his ticket)
WTH-7457: 1564/2 Elizabeth 1st MILLED
or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence. Milled issue, initial mark Star, S.R. 2598, Borden & Brown 33 02 R1. A rare example of an overdate in the milled
series. When you consider that “85% of Mestrelle’s
meagre experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562. This leaves 15% for all the other
Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage”, you
gain an insight into just how rare all non 1562 milled coins are. I don't tend to buy 1562 machine pressed
sixpences as they are invariably overpriced.
Queen Elizabeth 1st herself visited both mints (Upper &
Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on
WTH-7834: 1564/3
Elizabeth 1st MILLED or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence. Initial
mark Star, bust D, S.R.
2598. A rare example of an overdate in the milled series. When you consider that “85% of Mestrelle’s
meagre experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562. This leaves 15% for all the other
Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage”, you
gain an insight into just how rare all non 1562 milled coins are. I don't tend to buy 1562 machine pressed
sixpences as they are invariably overpriced.
Queen Elizabeth 1st herself visited both mints (Upper &
Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on
WTH-9166: Extremely Rare 1566/5/4 Elizabeth
1st Machine Pressed Silver Sixpence.
"Milled" coinage, initial mark Star, dated 1566. Not quite as rare as either of the later 1570
issues but contrary to what the reference books suggest, there's not too much
in it. Be under no illusion here - this
is an incredibly rare date in the milled series.
WTH-7835: 1567 Elizabeth
1st MILLED or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence. Initial mark Lis, S.R. 2599.
A rare example of an overdate in
the milled series. When you consider
that “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre experimental machine-made coins were
sixpences dated 1562. This leaves 15%
for all the other Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences,
halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage”,
you gain an insight into just how rare all non 1562 milled coins are. I don't tend to buy 1562 machine pressed
sixpences as they are invariably overpriced.
Queen Elizabeth 1st herself visited both mints (Upper &
Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on
WTH-7907:
1567 Elizabeth 1st MILLED
or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence. Initial
mark Lis, S.R.
2599. When you consider that “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre
experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562. This leaves 15% for all the other
Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage”, you
gain an insight into just how rare all non 1562 milled coins are. I don't tend to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences
as they are invariably overpriced. Queen
Elizabeth 1st herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses)
upon the occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on
WTH-7882:
1567 Elizabeth
1st Milled or Machine-Pressed Silver Sixpence with Excellent Provenance. Initial mark lis,
small crude bust, S.R. 2599. Borden & Brown 37 (O1/R1) - type 7c. The following, which I highlight at the top
of the Elizabeth 1st page, is fact:
“85% of Mestrelle’s meagre experimental machine-made coins were
sixpences dated 1562. This leaves 15%
for all the other Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences,
halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage.” It doesn’t take a statistician to see that
for S.R. to state that a 1567 milled 6d is
commoner than a 1562 6d is beyond ridiculous (I don't tend to buy 1562 machine
pressed sixpences as they are invariably overpriced). Queen Elizabeth 1st herself
visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near
completion of the recoinage on
Provenance:
Ex Spink
1948 and residing in the same family until recently. Old tickets here
WTH-7836: 1568/7
Elizabeth 1st MILLED or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence. Initial
mark Lis, S.R. 2599.
A rare example of an overdate in
the milled series. When you consider
that “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre experimental machine-made coins were
sixpences dated 1562. This leaves 15%
for all the other Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences,
halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage”,
you gain an insight into just how rare all non 1562 milled coins are. I don't tend to buy 1562 machine pressed
sixpences as they are invariably overpriced.
Queen Elizabeth 1st herself visited both mints (Upper &
Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on
Provenance:
Ex Arthur Fitts' collection.
WTH-7837: 1568/7
Elizabeth 1st MILLED or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence. Initial
mark Lis, S.R. 2599.
A rare example of an overdate in
the milled series. When you consider
that “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre experimental machine-made coins were
sixpences dated 1562. This leaves 15%
for all the other Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences,
halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage”,
you gain an insight into just how rare all non 1562 milled coins are. I don't tend to buy 1562 machine pressed
sixpences as they are invariably overpriced.
Queen Elizabeth 1st herself visited both mints (Upper &
Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on
WTH-7648:
1568/7 Elizabeth 1st
MILLED or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence.
Small bust with
ear showing, initial mark Lis, S.R. 2599. A
much rarer year although I’ve just, for the very first time, noticed that S.R. rate 1568 as commoner than 1562!! Now Sovereign Rarity’s price guide has many
strange anomalies riddled throughout (I’m being diplomatic!) but I have to say,
this one may well take the biscuit! I
don’t take too much notice of S.R. pricing as it’s all very general, based on
the commonest variety (ie there are more than x10 different varieties for 1651
Commonwealth shillings but S.R. only give one
price, which will be for the very commonest of those date varieties) and nearly
always priced too low, which is probably why I’ve never noticed this 62 v’s 68 thing before.
It should always be remembered that S.R.
is just a guide, not a set-in-stone-bible, although the differentials
between varieties should be reasonably accurate, which is definitely NOT the
case here. The following,
which I highlight at the top of the Elizabeth 1st page, is
fact: “85% of Mestrelle’s
meagre experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562. This leaves 15% for all the other
Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage.” It doesn’t take a statistician to see that
for S.R. to state that a 1568 milled 6d is
commoner than a 1562 6d is beyond ridiculous.
(I don't tend to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences as they are
invariably overpriced). Queen Elizabeth
1st herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the
occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on 10th July
1561. She met with Eloye
Mestrelle and viewed his machinery. The visit was reported to be six hours in
length. Eleven years later, Eloye Mestrelle was dismissed
from the mint in 1572 and just six years after that, he was executed (hanged)
for counterfeiting. A rarer date
coin. £395
Provenance:
Ex
Spink.
WTH-7801:
1568/7 Elizabeth
1st Machine Screw-Press Silver Sixpence. Small bust with ear showing, initial mark Lis, S.R. 2599. A much rarer year although I’ve just, for the
very first time, noticed that S.R. rate 1568 as commoner than 1562!! Now S.R.’s price guide has many strange anomalies
riddled throughout (I’m being diplomatic!) but I have to say, this one may well
take the biscuit! I don’t take too much
notice of S.R. pricing as it’s all very
general, based on the commonest variety (ie there are more than x10 different
varieties for 1651 Commonwealth shillings but S.R.
only give one price, which will be for the very commonest of those date
varieties) and nearly always priced too low, which is probably why I’ve never
noticed this 62 v’s 68 thing before. It should always be remembered that S.R. is just a guide, not a set-in-stone-bible,
although the differentials between varieties should be reasonably accurate, which
is definitely NOT the case here.
The following, which I highlight at the top of the Elizabeth 1st
page, is fact: “85% of Mestrelle’s
meagre experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562. This leaves 15% for all the other
Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage.” It doesn’t take a statistician to see that
for S.R. to state that a 1568 milled 6d is
commoner than a 1562 6d is beyond ridiculous.
(I don't tend to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences as they are
invariably overpriced). Queen Elizabeth
1st herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the
occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on 10th July
1561. She met with Eloye
Mestrelle and viewed his machinery. The visit was reported to be six hours in
length. Eleven years later, Eloye Mestrelle was dismissed
from the mint in 1572 and just six years after that, he was executed (hanged)
for counterfeiting. This is an
interesting, very late 1568 issue from dies that were failing, as evidenced
from the three separate obverse die flaws.
I have never seen any more than a single die flaw before. I suspect the pressure was reduced in the
press in order to facilitate this die lasting the course as there are
uncharacteristic corresponding poorly struck areas at 5 o’clock obv and 7 o’clock rev.
An interesting and rarer date coin.
£595
Provenance:
ex
Spink.
WAu-9160: Elizabeth 1st Hammered
Gold Half Angel. Initial mark Latin
Cross: 1580-81. Tower (London) mint, fifth
issue, no E and Rose above the cross, S.R.2527.
A rarer denomination than the full Angel which circulated at five
shillings. It is interesting to note
that unlike earlier hammered gold coinage, as well as later Commonwealth gold,
the half angels saw considerable circulation alongside the silver five shillings
/ crowns. The economy, buoyant under
Elizabeth 1st, was destined to enter a downward turn towards the end of the
reign, thus gold coinage would be far less a part of the general economy. Good provenance - old
tickets here. Rarely offered for
sale these days. £4,895
Provenance:
ex Seaby (old tickets), 1953?
£750
ex Tim
Owen (ticket), sold 2012 for £2,500
ex HistoryInCoins....sold 2015 for £2,995
ex
Scottish collection
Halfcrowns
WTH-7690:
1601 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Halfcrown. Seventh
issue, S.R. 2583. The Edward VI crowns and halfcrowns –
primarily just eye-catching big coins to promote Edward’s restoration of the
sterling standard (after Henry VIII’s escapades) in
1551 – didn’t really take off. The
German thaler, which was introduced actually before
Elizabeth 1st was even born, and the Spanish dollar or piece of
eight, was brought to the attention of the English mint towards the very end of
the reign as a bullion coin for use with the East India Company. Prior to 1600, the company had used foreign
coinage and then the testern or Portcullis pieces for
transportation of bullion, neither of which were well received by the monarchy,
particularly the latter as it did not bear the queen’s portrait. The large flans of these new crowns and halfcrowns
were ideal for the engraver Charles Anthony to display his ionic portrait which
pleased the queen enormously compared to the non portrait testerns. This was either luck or great foresight as
within 50 years, the halfcrown was the principle circulating coin in the
English economy! An interesting die
variation with the sceptre pointing to the I of REGINA as opposed to the usual
G. £2,895
Shillings
WTH-9117:
Extremely Rare Elizabeth
1st Hammered Shilling. Initial mark
Martlet, second issue, 1560-61. What
makes this a very rare coin indeed is a combination of grade and the fact that
this coin is a contemporary counterfeit.
The base metal core of the coin is evident where blistering over the
centuries has occurred, as well as on the edge.
This would have been laminated with a decent silver plating, but
obviously the combined metal value would have been much lower than an actual
shilling, which is where the counterfeiter would have made his money. I've seen two or three of these over the
years and without exception, the extant silver plate is virtually non-existant. This coin
retains 98% of the original silvering.
Better still is the die with which they struck the prepared blank to
create the actual coin. Clearly this
would have been a non-official, hand-made die, copying the official 3C bust,
but the workmanship is truly outstanding - astonishing, in fact. This would fool many people today, bar the
base metal blisters, and would surely have fooled everyone back in the
day! I have never seen the like before,
both in the quality of the die used and also in the almost unbelievable grade
of the coin, not just in the 1560's, when this coin would have hit the streets
of London but today, 460 years on! I
can't remember the last time I came across a coin that excited me, was in
exceptionally good grade, and was relatively inexpensive. £365 RESERVED (M.He.
1-4-25 Lay-Away)
WTH-8991: Very Rare Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver FIRST ISSUE Shilling.
Wire inner circles only, bust 1B (Brown bust 2), initial mark Lis: 1st January 1559 to the Spring of 1560. S.R. 2548.
A great rarity in the series and one that when it des turn up, which is
hardly ever, invariably has issues, or at the very least is much worn through a
combination of a poor obverse die (ie insufficient definition / depth on the
portrait) and much circulation. This
coin is one of the best known examples, being part of the famous Lingford collection in 1949 and Chris Comber's impressive,
more recent collection (dispersed DNW 2018), to which he was constantly
upgrading but this coin he simply could not better. Old tickets here. Chris Comber gives this RRR rarity which is
only one less R than the fabled undated sixpence to which he gave a rarity of
RRRR. An extremely rare coin,
particularly so in this grade. £1,550
Provenance:
Ex
Herbert Muspratt Lingford collection
(purchased March 1949)
Ex
Chris Comber collection
Ex
Tim Owen
WTH-7471: 1594-96 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Shilling. Sixth Issue, initial mark Woolpack, S.R. 2577. Bust 6B. Scratches to the face (deliberate, contemporary graffiti) otherwise a good, solid example of a scarcer denomination. £325
WTH-7905:
Elizabeth 1st
Early Hammered Silver Shilling. Initial mark Cross Crosslet,
bust 3C, second issue, S.R. 2555. Second issue Cross Crosslet hammered
shillings were only struck for a total of 10 months (1st December 1560 to 24th
October 1561) – interestingly, there was a 20 odd year hiatus before shillings
were once again issued under Elizabeth 1st.
Minimal wear on this coin - shillings upwards were extremely hard to
prepare dies for. The legends bit was
relatively easy but to cut a die with a view to getting a portrait onto a large
piece of silver, using the hammering process, what a remarkably difficult
undertaking and one that perhaps defeated the die sinkers most of the
time. £445
Sixpences
WTH-7456: 156Z/1 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Sixpence. Third & Fourth issues, initial
mark Pheon, S.R.
2561. 1562 as a date represents a
frequency of 1.8% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins
and 1.4% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. 1562 is the nineteenth rarest of all forty
two dates. An interesting die. You might be thinking this was an error (a Z
for a 2) but you’d be wrong. 1561 was a
huge year for sixpence output, there being x17 different dies in use with
several more prepared in case they needed them.
They didn’t and so when 1562 happened, one or two of those x17 dies that
hadn’t broken were recycled, along with the unused 1561 “reserve” dies. They decided a Z made a better number 2 until
they saw sense. There are fewer 156Z/1
dies recorded than straight 62 dies.
£265
WTH-7831: 1563/2 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Sixpence. Initial mark Pheon,
third & fourth issue. S.R.
2561. This date only ever occurs as an overdate - they clearly had a
lot of functional dies left over from 1562 which they adapted / recycled to
make 1563 dies. An unusual triple
vertical dot arrangement after ELIZABETH - it's usually a double or
occasionally a single dot. 1563 as a date represents a frequency of
0.6% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.4% for
all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.
1563 is the
seventh rarest of all forty two dates - it was a plague year with a
population mass exodus out of London, resulting in London commerce coming to a
virtual standstill. Only the people
who could afford to escape the plague left London but then they were the very
people generating commerce. Ex Mayfair Coins (1980) and thence to the famous
Chris Comber collection (his ticket).An important coin in the sixpence
series. £425
WTH-8116: 1563/2 Elizabeth 1st Tudor
Hammered Silver Sixpence. Initial mark Pheon, third & fourth
issue. S.R.
2561. This date only ever occurs as an overdate - they clearly had a
lot of functional dies left over from 1562 which they adapted / recycled to
make 1563 dies. An unusual triple
vertical dot arrangement after ELIZABETH - it's usually a double or
occasionally a single dot. 1563 as a date represents a frequency of
0.6% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.4% for
all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.
1563 is the
seventh rarest of all forty two dates - it was a plague year with a
population mass exodus out of London, resulting in London commerce coming to a
virtual standstill. Only the people
who could afford to escape the plague left London but then they were the very
people generating commerce. An important coin in the sixpence series. £385
WTH-7459: 1564 Elizabeth 1st Hammered
Silver Sixpence. Third & Fourth issues, initial
mark Pheon, S.R.
2561b. 1564 (all varieties) as a date
represents a frequency of 2.2% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth
1st coins and 1.8% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins, but you
also need to be aware that there are x14 recorded examples of all
1564 dies and ONLY ONE OF THOSE IS A STRAIGHT 64!! This is a very rare coin and hugely
underrated by most people. £245
WTH-7460: 1565 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Sixpence. Third & Fourth issues, initial
mark Rose, S.R. 2561b. Old tickets here. 1565 as a date represents a frequency of 3.8%
for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 2.5% for all
5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.
There was some impressive die life this year – only x5 dies are recorded
compared to way more for previous years.
Also, even though 64 was a huge year where they must have had many left
over dies, either partly used or reserve dies, there are no overdates for
1565. £175
WTH-7316:
1565 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Sixpence. Third and
fourth issue, initial mark Pheon, 1F bust variety – S.R. 2561.
Only five recorded dies. 1565 as
a date represents a frequency of 3.8% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of
Elizabeth 1st coins and 2.5% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard
coins. £125
WTH-7832: 1565 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Sixpence. Initial mark Rose (started late 1565:
1st October), third & fourth issue. S.R. 2561. This date only ever occurs as a straight
65 - they clearly had no functional dies left over from 1564 with which they
could adapt / recycle to make 1565 dies.
This is even more impressive when you learn that virtually all 1564
coins were recycled from old 1562 dies!
They had clearly got their act together after the fiasco of 1562 when
they had dies by the bucket full that went unused that year. 1565 as a date represents a frequency of 3.8%
for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 2.5% for all
5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.
It's a date you don't come across that often these days. £235
WTH-7462: 1567 Elizabeth 1st Hammered
Silver Sixpence. Third & Fourth issues, initial
mark Coronet, S.R. 2562. 1567 as a date represents a frequency of 6.6%
for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 4.8% for all
5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.
£235
WTH-7705:
1568 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence.
Third issue, initial mark Coronet, S.R.
2562. Ex C. Martin 1981, ex Chris Comber
collection. 1568 as a date represents a
frequency of 4.6% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins
and 5.1% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. Outstanding grade. £285
WTH-7772:
1572 Elizabeth
1st Tudor Hammered Silver Sixpence.
Initial mark Ermine, bust 4B, third & fourth issues, S.R. 2562.
This is an example of the UNCORRECTED die sinker’s error of the 2
in the date being both reversed and inverted.
Several recorded errors were made on various Elizabethan dies but I
think this is the most unforgivable because even if you were illiterate, you’d
surely notice an upside down, reversed 2 and if you didn’t, then surely the
quality control people would flag it up?!
And for it to then go into production to not only strike coinage but for
that coinage to then be deemed correct and good enough for distribution into
general circulation…???!!! It doesn’t
seem possible but it certainly happened.
It obviously was quickly discovered and corrected because coins exist
that are normal 2 struck over this inverted 2 die. Ex Arthur Fitts’
collection. £275
WTH-7464: 1573 Elizabeth 1st Hammered
Silver Sixpence. Third & Fourth issues, initial
mark Acorn, S.R. 2563. 1573 as a date represents a frequency of 4.6%
for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 5.3% for all 5,588
recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. £185
WTH-7706:
1576 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence.
Third issue, initial mark Eglantine, S.R.
2563. 1576 as a date represents a
frequency of 0.8% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins
and 1.0% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. 1576 is the sixteenth rarest of all forty two dates. Strong reverse, especially date. £125
WTH-8117: 1576
Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence. Third issue, initial mark Eglantine, S.R. 2563.
1576 as a date represents a frequency of 0.8% for the 2,716 recorded
single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 1.0% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth
1st hoard coins. 1576 is the sixteenth rarest of all
forty two dates. A very
good grade coin with minor reverse graffiti.
£295
WTH-7599:
1577/6
Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.
Initial mark Eglantine, third & fourth issues, S.R. 2563.
1577 as a date represents a frequency of 0.4% for the 2,716 recorded
single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.4% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st
hoard coins. 1577 is the sixth rarest of all
forty two dates. Whilst
you can’t argue with the data, I would have placed 1577 at more like 4th or 5th,
but that’s clearly anecdotal.
Interestingly, 1577, and to a lesser extent, 1576, are often thought of
as common dates as they are both completely surrounded by commoner dates on a
graph of extant recorded examples.
Interestingly, 1577 does not exist as a straight 77 – they are all
overstruck on old recycled 1576 dies. It
is telling that very few 1577 sixpences were actually struck as they were
winding down the Fourth coinage: not only is there a Fifth coinage 1578/7
variety (showing that they did actually produce a straight 1577 but didn’t use
it), but there is also a Fifth coinage 1578/7/6 variety showing that the 1577/6
was clearly only used sparingly in 1577 as it was still viable in 1578, albeit
with yet another alteration. A very rare
coin. £425
WTH-7670:
1580 over 1579 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence.
Fifth coinage, bust 5A, initial mark Latin Cross, S.R. 2572.
Overdates, with altered initial marks, are found because too many dies
were sunk in a year where less coinage was struck that was originally expected,
often down to availability of bullion.
These old dies were effectively recycled up to three years later. It is interesting to note that although
changing the initial mark was obligatory, in line with the various pyx inspections, the date was not required to be
changed. They are actually quite rare in
all coinages, but specifically for the fifth coinage, it only really happened
three times. When you think that 79 to
be changed to 80 would have been twice the work, you begin to wonder why they
bothered changing the date at all. The
overdate on this coin is very clear.
1580 as a date represents a frequency of 3.7% for the 2,716 recorded
single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 4.1% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth
1st hoard coins. £225
WTH-7572: 1585 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Sixpence. Initial
mark Escallop, sixth issue. Only a
single 1585 die recorded – two future overdates (1586/5 and 1587/6/5) are
recorded which were basically recycled dies from previous years, ie they made
more 1585 dies than they actually used.
1585 as a date represents a frequency of 1.4% for the 2,716 recorded
single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 2.1% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth
1st hoard coins. 1585 is the twentieth rarest of all
forty two dates.
£145
WTH-9073:
1588 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence. Sixth issue, initial mark Crescent, S.R. 2578A.
1588 as a date represents a frequency of 0.2% for the 2,716 recorded
single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.2% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth
1st hoard coins. 1588 is the fourth rarest of all
forty two dates. The
famous Spanish Armada date and although only 4th rarest in the
“league table”, this date is arguably the most sought after of all dates. If you check prices in previous (proper) coin
auctions, you’ll see some very high prices, especially in the States, and don’t
forget there’s 30% buyer’s commission on top of those prices. Interestingly, this coin looks to have been a
15-- die where the final 8 has been added, presumably because this was a time
of austerity where relatively few coins were struck; the thought being that these
dies could be used over several years without the need to overdate. I have since bought a 1588 6d (WTH-7833) where both number 8s
look to have bee added to a 15-- die.
£485
WTH-8119: 1589 - final 9 over
sideways 9 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence.
Sixth issue, initial mark Crescent, S.R.
2578A. Note the two 9's are actually
level with the 15 although both final digits were added to a finished 15--
die. In some instances, only the final
digit was added to a 158- die. This was
a time of austerity where relatively few coins were struck; the thought being
that these dies could be used over several years without the need to
overdate. However, much more important
is the final 9, it being overstruck over a sideways 9 and further, that upright
9 was struck over another upright 9.
Messrs. Brown, Comber & Wilkinson, the undisputed leading experts on
all things numismatically linked to Elizabeth 1st, in their research paper (published
2006, updated 2012), do record this sideways 9 but not the second upright
9. Interestingly, the same employee at
the mint who thought a sideways 9 was a good idea to add to a 15-- die was
probably the same one who in 1588 thought a sideways 8 was an equally good and
acceptable idea! 1580 also has an 8 over
a sideways 8. After 1589, no more errors
of this nature are recorded thus we can assume that he was either cured of his
sideways view on things or moved out! 1589
as a date represents a frequency of 0.5% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of
Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.5% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard
coins. 1589 is the eighth rarest of all forty two dates. £165
Provenance:
Ex Chris
Comber collection.
WTH-8121: High Grade 1590 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence. Sixth issue,
initial mark Hand, S.R. 2578B. 1590 as a date represents a frequency of 1.0%
for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 1.2% for all
5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.
1590 is the
fourteenth rarest of all forty two dates. Outstanding grade for a coin so late in the
series. Ex Chris Comber collection. £465
WTH-7671:
1591 over 1590 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence.
Sixth coinage, bust 6C, initial mark Hand, S.R.
2578B. Overdates, with altered initial
marks, are found because too many dies were sunk in a year where less coinage
was struck that was originally expected, often down to availability of
bullion. These old dies were effectively
recycled up to three years later. It is
interesting to note that although changing the initial mark was obligatory, in
line with the various pyx inspections, the date was
not required to be changed. 1590 changed
to 1591 is a strange one in that most of the 1590 sixpences issued were made
from 1589 recycled dies and the rest were from straight 1590 dies. They clearly didn’t issue many straight 1590
coins (it is a rarer year) because the dies were barely used – they took the
1591 dies, seeing they were still fresh, and altered them to produce 1591
coinage. 1591 as a date represents a
frequency of 1.2% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins
and 1.2% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. 1591 is the fifteenth rarest of all forty two
dates. £255
WTH-7092:
1592 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.
Initial mark Tun, sixth issue. S.R. 2578B.
1592 as a date represents a frequency of 2.5% for the 2,716 recorded single
finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 2.4% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st
hoard coins. £95
WTH-7560:
1593 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Sixpence. Sixth
issue, initial mark Tun, bust 6C, S.R. 2578B.
Sometime cleaned. Ex A. Travis
collection. 1593 as a date represents a
frequency of 2.5% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins
and 2.4% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. Only x3 recorded straight 93 dies
recorded. These later dates are
invariably lower grade and problematic but this coin is much above average. £275
WTH-7805:
1594 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence
Sixth issue, initial mark Woolpack, which was in use 9th May
1594 to 13th February 1596.
The straight 94, of which this is very much an example, is less
frequently seen than the commoner 1594/3 overdates. Saying that, 94 is still overall a rare year:
1594 as a date represents a frequency of 2.6% for the 2,716 recorded single
finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 2.6% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st
hoard coins. Again, by this date, the
quality of dies and the actual end product seemed to have been a far distant
memory so it’s nice, not to say unusual, to see such a good grade example. S.R.
2578B. Impact mark or punch below the
Queen’s ear. Nicely toned. £175
WTH-7319:
1596 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Sixpence. Sixth
issue, initial mark Key, S.R. 2578B. One of the rare years - 1596 as a date
represents a frequency of 0.7% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth
1st coins and 1.0% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. 1596 is the eleventh rarest of all forty two dates. A grand total of three recorded dies (one of
which is 9/6, another being bereft of any initial mark whatsoever) illustrates
just how rare a year this is. Unusually
for these rare later dates, this coin is actually very nice grade for
issue. £295
WTH-7806:
1596 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence
Sixth issue, initial mark Key, which was in use 13th February
1596 to 7th February 1599.
There were no overdates (ie recycled reverse dies) used for this rare
year: 1596 as a date represents a frequency of 0.7% for the 2,716 recorded
single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 1.0% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth
1st hoard coins. 1596 is the eleventh rarest of all
forty two dates. The late
1590’s to the end in 1602 were poor years in terms of quality of dies and
sixpence coinage, even more so than the 1580’s.
Anecdotally, the silver alloy content deteriorated as well, thereby not
helping the state of the coinage. Not
the most photogenic of coins; it is, however, a very nice grade example of this
rarer, late year, albeit afflicted with an inferior silver alloy, along with perhaps
every other 1596 coin going. A very nice
and hard to find example. £365
WTH-7709:
1597 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence. Sixth issue, initial mark Key, S.R. 2578B.
1597 as a date represents a frequency of <0.04% for the 2,716
recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and <0.03% for all 5,588
recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. *** 1597 is the rarest of all
forty two dates *** I have
only had one better through my hands in many, many years. That was the Walter Wilkinson coin which now
forms the backbone of a very impressive, growing collection and definitely not
available. A great rarity, especially in
this grade. £950
WTH-8122: 1597 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence. Sixth issue,
initial mark Key, S.R. 2578B. Note the 97 digits are actually lower than
they should be, indicating that both final digits were added to a finished 15--
die. 1597 as a date represents a
frequency of <0.04% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st
coins and <0.03% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. *** 1597 is the rarest of all forty two dates
*** A great rarity. £525
WTH-8031:
1599/8 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.
Initial mark a straight Anchor, Sixth issue, S.R.
2578B. 1599 as a date represents a frequency
of 0.2% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.1% for
all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.
*** 1599 is the
third rarest of all forty two dates *** There was an economic depression during the final
years of the sixteenth century, a factor hugely relevant in the rarity of this
coin. This led to a situation where
there was an oversupply of dies, resulting in date alterations (we see
1599/8/6, 99/8 [this coin] and 99/6).
This scenario only started in 1598 as prior to that date, we see very
little, if any overdating – even 1597 was a straight
date. More interesting still, this coin
is an unrecorded 1599 (large final 9) over 1599 (small final 9) over 1598. One die is recorded where BOTH the 9 and 8 of
the date were overstruck with a large 9 punch but this is just the final digit
and a smaller 9 is indicated in terms of the trailing tail. I have to say that this trailing tail may or
may not be a small 9 but even if it isn't, this is still unrecorded in that
only a single large 9 was used. Ex
Ewerby Hoard. Not a particularly
pleasing coin but nevertheless hugely interesting, very rare and benefiting
from coming from that well known, recent hoard – and by the way, this large
hoard was very much made up of worn coins from circulation with apparently zero
consideration given for any part of it to be “nice coins” – these were the
coins available to the individual who put that hoard together at that
time. This 1599/8 is fairly
representative across the board in terms of grade, showing us that the general
coinage in circulation in the 1640’s – the given date of this hoard – was
poor. It’s frustrating when people
demand high grade, choice sixpences and complain that all see are “battered,
low grade” examples. The Chris Comber
and Walter Wilkinson Elizabeth 1st collections had their fair share
of coins looking like this, even after many decades of collecting and
upgrading. A rare coin. £375
Provenance:
Ex Ewerby
Hoard
WTH-9074:
1600/159- Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Sixpence. Sixth issue, initial mark 0, bust
6B - S.R. 2578B. For the vast bulk of Elizabethan coinage,
little or no foresight had been used regarding dates and initial marks,
resulting in glaring overdates when the old dies were used again (recycled) in
subsequent years, for example the famous 1578/7/6. There are many others. The penny dropped at the mint, eventually,
that perhaps sinking dies but omitting initial marks and with only partial
dates (those to be added when the dies were brought into use), might be a good
idea. Amusingly, this practice was
adopted in, wait for it, 1599 - the most inappropriate time possible because
the following year was 1600 with three digits changing as opposed to usually
one and rarely two! Rather than throw
away the prepared 159- "future-proof" dies, they decided to alter the
middle two digits from -59- to -60-. The
first digit (thankfully!) didn't need changing and all they had to do was add
the 0 to the end of the date, as well as add the initial mark in the gap
provided. Thus we have 1600 over 159-
coins. Interestingly, these 159- dies
were also used in 1601 but even after adding the final digit and changing the
middle two, they discovered that the first and last digits were so far apart in
time that they were actually from different punches and so different! Demand for English coin was much in decline
at this period so these were tiny mintages: 1600 as a date represents a
frequency of 0.4% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins
and 0.1% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. 1600 is the fifth rarest of all forty two dates. I have to say that I don't see 1600 as being
as abundant as that, and I'm far from the only person saying that. A rare coin indeed. £475
WTH-7558:
1601 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.
Seventh issue, initial mark 1, S.R.
2584. Toned. 1601 as a date represents a frequency of 0.6%
for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.7% for all
5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.
1601 is the tenth
rarest of all forty two dates.
These later dates are invariably lower grade and problematic but this
coin certainly bucks that trend. £285
Provenance:
ex Ken Bressett collection,
ex H.
Mitchell ($140 twenty years ago)
WTH-9141:
1601 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.
Seventh issue, initial mark 1, 29th July 1601 to 14th May 1602. S.R.
2585. 1601 as a date represents a
frequency of 0.6% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins
and 0.7% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. 1601 is the tenth rarest of all forty two dates. This is an interesting coin
in that it's a straight 1601, rather than an earlier 159- recycled die where
the middle 5 and 9 were overstruck with a 6 and a 0. The final 1 would have been added at the same
time. A large percentage of 1601
sixpences were from recycled 159- dies (even after they'd recycled many of
those dies for the 1600 coinage!) as the coinage output for the late 1590's was
far below what the dies were set up to produce.
As such, this coin was probably struck late into the issue, early
1602. Of note is the 0 in the date -
it's unusually small compared to the rest of the date. They also felt the need to strike it twice -
absolutely no idea why they'd do that, unless they thought they were using a
larger 0 on the second strike?! - which implies the actual die was a 16-- die,
not a 160- die, with the final two digits (as well as the initial marks)
being added after the main striking.
Interesting though that is, of perhaps more importance is the
grade. These later sixpences were
notoriously poor in terms of dies and strike (and sometimes even the silver
alloy) compared with the earlier dates.
This coin is actually a pleasing VF example for issue and thus
rare. £465
Provenance:
ex John
Noel Simpson collection
ex Spink
WTH-7174:
1602 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.
Seventh issue, initial mark 2 – the last ever date in the lengthy Elizabeth
1st sixpence series. S.R. 2585.
1602 as a date represents a frequency of 1.9% for the 2,716 recorded
single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 2.1% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth
1st hoard coins. Sold with an auction
printout as well as a collector’s cabinet ticket. £125
Groats
WTH-7904:
Elizabeth 1st
Early Hammered Silver Groat or Fourpence. Initial mark Martlet, bust 1F, second issue, S.R. 2556. Second issue Martlet hammered groats were only
struck for a total of 10 months (9th December 1560 to 24th
October 1561) – interestingly, the Martlets and Cross
Crosslets were the last hammered groats issued under her reign, even though
Elizabeth reigned for a further 40+ years.
This is a beautiful coin, being excellent grade, centrally struck,
attractively toned, etc etc. £475
Threepences
WTH-7300:
1561 Elizabeth 1st Rare
Large Flan Hammered Silver Threepence. Third and Fourth Issues of 1561-77, rose
behind Queen, reverse dated. Large
15mm flan (in fact, this one is nearer to 16mm), S.R.
2564. Creased and straightened, with
some resultant cracking, as so many of these newly introduced issues were – the
public were still on hightened alert for fakes after
the numismatic escapades of Elizabeth’s father, Henry VIII, and her bother,
Edward VI, although to be fair, the early issues of Edward VI, extremely
debased as they were, had very little to do with the Edward. It is unusual to see dated threepences for
the 1560’s but they obviously do exist.
1561 was something of a prolific year for threepences BUT, this very
first issue of 1561, in fact the very first Elizabeth 1st threepence issued), with it’s large flan, is represented by
a single die only. Brown, Comber &
Wilkinson postulate that this large flan threepence
was a two month trial period of experimentation. The start date of production was 26th
October 1561 and the end date – the date where they decided to change to the
smaller flans, was December 1561 or early January 1562. A rare and important coin. £345
WTH-7608:
156Z/1
Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Threepence. Third & fourth issues, initial mark Pheon, S.R. 2565. An interesting die. You might be thinking this was an error (a Z
for a 2) but you’d be wrong. 1561 was a
huge year for sixpence output as well as threepences, but not on the same
scale. Like the sixpences, some of the
61 dies that hadn’t broken were recycled, along with the unused 1561 “reserve”
dies. They decided a Z made a better
number 2 – there were no 1562/1 threepences and indeed, there was even a
straight 156Z issued when they’d recycled all the old 1561 dies. It was midway through 1562 that the decision
was taken to change the Z for a proper 2.
This Z for 2 was actually nothing new as the earlier Edward VI crowns
also used a Z for a 2. Sold with an old
ticket that (incorrectly) states 156Z/2.
A nice grade coin. £135
WTH-7312:
1563 over 2
Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Threepence. Third & fourth issues, initial mark Pheon, S.R. 2565. Just like the sixpence, 1563 is one of the
rarest dates in the entire series. There
are only x2 dies recorded by Brown, Comber & Wilkinson (2006) for 1563 and
further, only one of those is this overdate.
Ex Dupree (a well respected collection) and ex Capozollo. A rare coin.
£245
WTH-7287:
1566 Rare Date
Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Threepence. Initial mark Portcullis. Third and fourth issues, smaller flan,
regular bust, S.R. 2565. Not so rare in sixpences but when you
consider that there were only TWO 1566 threepence
dies in use, with NO overdates (2006 data), it’s rare in threepences. A general rule of thumb you may wish to note
is that 1560’s Elizabeth 1st coins, bar sixpences, are rarer. This date is an extremely rare year. Excellent grade - much better in the hand
than the images suggest, hence the extra cheap camera phone image I’ve
included. £265
WTH-7418: 1568 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Threepence in Higher Grade. Third and fourth issues (although Wilkinson,
Comber & Brown go further by designated this as Third Coinage only),
initial mark Coronet. S.R. 2566.
I’ve been asked several times about the odd looking 8 in 1568
coinage. It looks for all it’s worth to
be an 8 over 7, but in fact they are all straight 68 dates unless
you can see the ghosting of the angled diagonal of the 7 under the 8. The die sinkers simply gave the 8 a flat
top. This coin benefits from yet another
unusual feather in that the bottom circle of the 8 is broken! There is a rarer variety where the flat top
of the 8 is on the bottom, ie an inverted 8 but interestingly, this coin is
actually rarer than the inverted 8 3d types!
1568 threepences utilised only three dies – 68/7 (the 8 being inverted),
68 (the 8 being inverted), and a 1568 with “normal” flat topped 8, meaning the
flat topped 8 1568 threepence is rarer by 2:1. An interesting coin and much, much better
grade than normally seen. £225
WTH-7088:
1570 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Threepence. Initial mark Castle, third and fourth issues,
S.R. 2566. Ex Eccles collection. £95
WTH-7377: 1571 Elizabeth 1st Hammered
Silver Threepence. Third and fourth issues, initial mark
Castle. S.R. 2566. A very
pleasing example. £185
WTH-7417: 1572 (2 over inverted 2)
Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Threepence. Third and fourth issues (although Wilkinson,
Comber & Brown go further by designated this as Third Coinage only),
initial mark Ermine. S.R. 2566. A
really interesting die sinker’s error where the final 2 of the date was
originally inverted or upside down.
Quality control picked up on this (ie someone happened to notice it!)
and so rather than start a new die from scratch, they simply put a correctly
orientated 2 over the top of the error.
This is a single die (you’ll be pleased to hear the mistake was not
repeated!) and can be chronologically attributed to the very first issue of
1572, ie 19th April onwards.
£185
WTH-7301:
1575/4 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Threepence. Third and fourth issue, initial mark
Eglantine, ear showing. S.R. 2566. A
very nice grade coin but perhaps of more interest is the overdate: 1575/4. Brown, Comber & Wilkinson published that
only a single recorded 75/4 die was known in 2006. In the intervening years, more examples have
been unearthed resulting in x3 dies now being known and a miniscule 9 recorded
examples of this overdate only. For
those interested, Eglantine spanned 29th May 1574 to 13th
July 1578 so it is clear to see what happened – as the year turned to 1575, the
74 Eglantine dies were still good enough to use, thus initial mark Eglantine
was able to remain and a simple date adjustment to the die (although if that’s
all they had to do, you have to question the skill of the die sinker based on
the result!) sufficed. £175
WTH-7249:
1575 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Threepence. Initial mark Eglantine, third & fourth
issues, regular bust, S.R. 2566. This particular initial mark was relatively
long-lived, being introduced 29th May 1574 and shelved 13th
July 1578. However, 1575 dated coins are
represented by a single die only. This
is most surprising until we realise that there were actually plenty of 1575
dies sunk, but they were not used in 1575. There is a 1575/4, which I only mention for
context. The bulk of the 1575 unused
reverse dies were: 1576/5, 1577/5, 1577/6/5, 1578/7/5. An unusually high grade example and a rare
date / im combination. Rare on both counts. £235
WTH-7389:
1576/5 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Tudor Threepence. Initial mark
Eglantine, third & fourth issues.
S.R. 2566. A rarer year with only
one straight 76 die and this modified 76 over 75 die according to Brown,
Comber & Wilkinson. £165
WTH-7378: 1579 Elizabeth 1st Hammered
Silver Threepence. Fifth issue, initial mark Greek Cross. S.R. 2573. Just
the single die pairing being recorded by Comber, Wilkinson & Brown,
although there was another pair prepared which were not used in 1579 but were overdated and used in 1580.
This coin is not far off being as struck, although the obverse strike
quality could have been better. £195
Halfgroats
WTH-7573:
1560-61
Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Halfgroat.
Initial mark Martlet, second issue, S.R. 2557. Collectors will be aware that of all the
smaller denominations, the halfgroats suffered most in terms of clipping, wear
and sometimes the quality of actual coinage leaving the mint. Finding a really nice halfgroat is virtually
impossible whereas pennies, and even the fractions, are relatively
abundant. Sold with collector’s cabinet
ticket together with an information printout.
£155
WTH-7313:
1584-86
Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Halfgroat. Sixth issue, initial mark Escallop, S.R.
2579. Collectors will be aware that of
all the smaller denominations, the halfgroats suffered most in terms of
clipping, wear and sometimes the quality of actual coinage leaving the
mint. Finding a really nice halfgroat is
virtually impossible whereas pennies, and even the fractions, are relatively
abundant. £175
WTH-7488: 1601 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Halfgroat. Seventh issue, initial mark 1. S.R. 2586.
Nice grade and sold with a detailed annotated coin envelope. £125
WTH-7646:
Elizabeth 1st
Tudor Hammered Silver Halfgroat.
Seventh and final issue with initial mark 1 so 1601. Further image here. London mint, S.R. 2579. Ex Shaun Aldom
collection. £185
WTH-8029: 1560-61 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Halfgroat. Initial
mark Martlet, second issue, S.R. 2557.
Collectors will be aware that of all the smaller denominations, the
halfgroats suffered most in terms of clipping, wear and sometimes the quality
of actual coinage leaving the mint.
Finding a really nice halfgroat is virtually impossible whereas pennies,
and even the fractions, are relatively abundant. A really nice example that evaded the best
efforts of the Tudor and Stuart clippers!
£185
Pennies
WTH-7360:
Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Penny. Third &
fourth issue, initial mark Crescent, 1587-89.
S.R. 2580. Ex Dr E. Burstall collection.
£69
Three Farthings
WTH-7332:
1561 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Three Farthings. The
three farthings – a bizarre dated fractional denomination – started in 1561 and
ended in 1582 (with just x15 dates used), never to see the numismatic light of
day again. Interestingly, the
Elizabethan public would not have been as flabbergasted at the introduction of
this odd coin as perhaps we are: Irish base coinage was circulating at this
time in England at 25% face value and the earlier English base issue
halfgroats were officially reduced in September 1560 as, wait for it… three
farthings. The public of the day were
well aware of this required fractional calculation. Only three different dies recorded for this
date. Initial mark Pheon,
which didn’t even start production until the end of the year in 26th
October 1561!! This coin ex Dr Tony
Abramson (he paid £85 in 1989), ex Leeds Museum Winter 1994/5 display and ex
Spink, the latter having been tasked with dispersing the Abrahamson collection
in 2021. Tickets here. S.R.
2571. A most interesting coin.
£265
WTH-7432: 1562 Elizabeth I Hammered
Silver Three Farthings. Initial mark
pheon, third and fourth coinage. S.R. 2571. A very rare date for this
denomination as for the straight 2, there was only the single die in use at the tail end of the year (prior
to this they were using recycled 1561 dies, ie 1562/1). It got so little usage in 1562 that in was
recycled in 1564 (there was no issue of this denomination in 1563) as a
1564/2. The three farthings wasn’t even worth a penny and yet they went to a great
deal of effort to create the dies for this unlikely fractional unit,
incorporating a date and really working on sinking dies on an almost
microscopic level, especially when you consider they only had daylight or
candlelight and with little of today’s magnification techniques. Die sinkers in particular often lost their
eyesight in later life, and of course, “later life” in Tudor times was probably
around 40 or younger! The three farthings – a bizarre dated fractional
denomination – started in 1561 and ended in 1582 (with just x15 dates used),
never to see the numismatic light of day again.
Interestingly, the Elizabethan public would not have been as
flabbergasted at the introduction of this odd coin as perhaps we are: Irish
base coinage was circulating at this time in England at 25% face value and
the earlier English base issue halfgroats were officially reduced in September
1560 as, wait for it… three farthings.
The public of the day were well aware of this required fractional
calculation. An iconic denomination,
unique to Elizabeth 1st, £265
WTH-7434: 1575 over 5 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Three Farthings.
Initial mark eglantine, third and fourth coinage. S.R. 2571. Rare over-date, completely
unrecorded by Comber, Wilkinson. 1575
was a single die year with the same die in use in the following year as a
modified / recycled 1576/5, thus showing that very few 1575 three halfpence
were struck, and a further two 1575 dies, which were prepared but never used in
that year, used in 1578 (1578/5), 1579 (1579/5) and 1581 (1581/75). The three farthings wasn’t
even worth a penny and yet they went to a great deal of effort to create the
dies for this unlikely fractional unit, incorporating a date and really working
on sinking dies on an almost microscopic level, especially when you consider
they only had daylight or candlelight and with little of today’s magnification
techniques. Die sinkers in particular
often lost their eyesight in later life, and of course, “later life” in Tudor
times was probably around 40 or younger!
The three farthings – a bizarre dated
fractional denomination – started in 1561 and ended in 1582 (with just x15
dates used), never to see the numismatic light of day again. Interestingly, the Elizabethan public would
not have been as flabbergasted at the introduction of this odd coin as perhaps
we are: Irish base coinage was circulating at this time in England at 25% face
value and the earlier English base issue halfgroats were officially
reduced in September 1560 as, wait for it… three farthings. The public of the day were well aware of this
required fractional calculation. An
iconic denomination, unique to Elizabeth 1st. £295
Halfpennies
WTH-7497: 1587-89 Elizabeth 1st
Milled Silver Halfpenny. Sixth issue, initial mark
Crescent. S.R. 2581. Ex David Rogers’ collection. I had a similar coin from the famous Chris
Comber collection and on his ticket, he had Crescent down as a “Rare
Mark”. For those collectors interested
in marrying up coins with historical events, 1588 is the date of the Spanish
Armada. £145
WTH-7913:
1602 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Portcullis Halfpenny.
Initial mark 2, seventh issue, S.R.
2588. It is interesting to note that the
halfpenny was a late addition to the varied Elizabethan portfolio of
denominations, being introduced post 1582 in the sixth coinage. Only a single pair of dies was used throughout
the reign, and indeed the same die pair was used very early on under James
1st. During 1601, the obverse die became
damaged and was repaired. All subsequent
coins show the repair (left hand side of the portcullis - no bolt connecting
the third horizontal bar to the second vertical bar), including the James 1st
issue. This coin has no such repair and
so is one of those very interesting contemporary counterfeits. These are superbly done but to be fair, it
was the easiest coin to copy. Ex Chris Comber
collection. What a coin! £195
WTH-7951:
Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Portcullis Halfpenny.
Sixth issue, Tower (London) mint, initial mark A, 1582-84, S.R. 2581. A tiny Tudor coin, although not the tiniest,
being extremely well struck and in very good grade. Ex Mike Vosper ticket with an anomalous
description but the correct S.R. number, conceivably indicating a ticket dated
to before S.R. changed the issue groupings around. £155
WTH-8114: Elizabeth 1st Tudor
Hammered Silver Portcullis Halfpenny. Initial mark Key, sixth issue, 1595-8, Tower mint, S.R. 2581. A tiny coin
but not the tiniest - that honour goes to a farthing issued by Elizabeth's
father, Henry VIII. I have one in stock
which will find its way onto this sight soon.
£95
“Other”
WTH-7390:
Elizabeth 1st
Queen Under Canopy Copper Jetton or Medalet. Struck under the reign of King James 1st,
1610-15, by Hans Krauwinkel
at Nuremberg.
All “monarch under canopy” jettons are
rare. Ex Porter (1994), ex Walter
Wilkinson. £145
WTH-9110:
1589 Elizabeth
1st Jetton or Medalet - DEFEAT OF THE SPANISH ARMADA. As ever, much imagery: a pious Elizabeth 1st,
seated, holding a prayer book, and a reverse suggesting that England is an
innocent green tree supporting young, nesting birds whilst being attacked by
the hawkish Spanish. Medallic
Illustrations 153/128, Dugn 3230. May 1588 witnessed a Spanish fleet consisting
of about 130 ships with about 8,000 seamen and possibly as many as 19,000
soldiers leaving Lisbon en route for England.
It was a formidable attack force - they termed it the Invincible Armada
- which was four years in the making but which ultimately failed. Julius Caesar's two invasions of Britain in
55 and 54 BC failed mainly because of the weather but whilst the Spanish Armada
failed in part due to bad weather, it was bad tactics with bad luck that
defeated the Spanish Armada. It's quite
surprising that it took a year to prepare the dies and even longer to get the
medals out to the public. A high grade
example - remember, this is 1589 and copper is a soft metal. £335
Provenance
ex S
& B Coins (Simon Monks & Brian Reeds)1992
ex
Baldwin's
WTH-9111:
1585 Elizabeth
1st Jetton or Medalet - ASSISTANCE TO THE UNITED PROVINCES. As ever, much imagery: Elizabeth 1st,
enthroned, gives roses to two deputies - "THE SOUL IS SLAIN BY THE NECTAR
OF THE (ENGLISH) ROSE". The reverse
depicts two Spaniards eating hay along with a donkey and an ass: "I
DESPISE AMBROSIA; I EAT HAY". Medallic
Illustrations 133/86, Dugn 3044.
Provenance
ex S
& B Coins (Simon Monks & Brian Reeds)1995
ex
WTH-9112:
1586 Elizabeth
1st SILVER Jetton or Medalet - ASSISTANCE TO THE
UNITED PROVINCES. As ever, much
imagery: Elizabeth 1st, enthroned, attended by
Provenance
ex S
& B Coins (Simon Monks & Brian Reeds)1997
ex
WTH-9175: 1589 Elizabeth 1st Large
Silver Medal - Dangers Averted. Alluding to the destruction of the Spanish Armada
and the removal of probably the greatest danger Elizabeth 1st faced in her very
long reign. As with the first Roman
invasion in 55 BC, the good old British weather saved the day. The obverse depicts the Queen in high relief,
wearing pearls, an extremely large ruff, etc; the reverse, a bay-tree, uninjured
by lightning and winds, E.R. flanking it.
Medallic Illustrations (i) 155/133, listed as
RARE. Cast & chased silver, 61mm x
45mm, 31.48 grams in weight, high grade.
Medallic Illustrations - published in the 1800's - suggests this medal "...
was probably executed during the last
century", so 1700's in date, although it is interesting to note that the
obverse bay-tree die is from M.I. (i) 148/119, a
naval reward dated 1588 which is very much a contemporary medal of the
day. Coinage is there to do a job and
also to promote the monarch of the day, whereas medals are there to symbolise
achievements, recognition, and honour, but again, promotion of the monarch of
the day was never something to shy away from!
A large silver medal in high grade with unequivocal eye-appeal. Rare.
£550
WTH-9281: 1572
Elizabeth 1st Tudor Cast Silver Medal -
"Defence of the Kingdom". A
crudely cast silver medal, undated but circa 1572. Obverse: Elizabeth 1st facing left, a
portcullis before her face, a rose to the right / Castle on a mount or hill,
dividing ER, a globe below. Medallic Illustrations (i)
120/57, Eimer 48A. Very similar in style
to the milled coinage of
£695
Provenance:
Unidentified old (detailed)
ticket
ex British Hammered Coins,
£475, sold to ...
ex "collection of a
gentleman"
ex Spink