Elizabeth I (1558 - 1603) Read about Elizabeth I

 

 

**** An indication as to the way the market has moved over the last few years for Elizabeth 1st coinage. ****

 

 
 
Mestrelle’s Machine Pressed or “Milled” Silver Issue

 

“85% of Mestrelle’s meagre experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562. 

This leaves 15% for all the other Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage.”

 

 

Sixpences

 

WTH-8007:  1561 Elizabeth 1st Milled or Machine-Pressed Silver Sixpence.  "Milled" coinage, initial mark Star, dated 1561, this being the very first dated Elizabeth 1st coin.  S.R. 2593.  When you consider that “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562.  This leaves 15% for all the other Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage”, you gain an insight into just how rare all non 1562 milled coins are.  I don't tend to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences as they are invariably overpriced.  Queen Elizabeth 1st herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on 10th July 1561 (so here you see that the 1561 issue was certainly not even over a full year).  She met with Eloye Mestrelle and viewed his machinery.  The visit was reported to be six hours in length.  Eleven years later, Eloye Mestrelle was dismissed from the mint in 1572 and just six years after that, he was executed (hanged) for counterfeiting.  Interestingly, this coin has been bent and straightened, most likely via the use of teeth!  When this issue first appeared on the streets of London in the later months of 1561, it was so different looking to what was in peoples' pockets at the time that it was met with immediate suspicion and distrust.  People literally bit and bent the coins to test the metal content.  A rare date - the first I've had in many years, if memory serves, together with a tangible insight into 1561 Tudor life in London!  £435

Ex John Newman (his ticket)

 

WTH-7457:  1564/2 Elizabeth 1st MILLED or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence.  Milled issue, initial mark Star, S.R. 2598, Borden & Brown 33 02 R1.  A rare example of an overdate in the milled series.  When you consider that “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562.  This leaves 15% for all the other Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage”, you gain an insight into just how rare all non 1562 milled coins are.  I don't tend to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences as they are invariably overpriced.  Queen Elizabeth 1st herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on 10th July 1561.  She met with Eloye Mestrelle and viewed his machinery.  The visit was reported to be six hours in length.  Eleven years later, Eloye Mestrelle was dismissed from the mint in 1572 and just six years after that, he was executed (hanged) for counterfeiting.  £425

 

WTH-7834:  1564/3 Elizabeth 1st MILLED or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence.  Initial mark Star, bust D, S.R. 2598.  A rare example of an overdate in the milled series.  When you consider that “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562.  This leaves 15% for all the other Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage”, you gain an insight into just how rare all non 1562 milled coins are.  I don't tend to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences as they are invariably overpriced.  Queen Elizabeth 1st herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on 10th July 1561.  She met with Eloye Mestrelle and viewed his machinery.  The visit was reported to be six hours in length.  Eleven years later, Eloye Mestrelle was dismissed from the mint in 1572 and just six years after that, he was executed (hanged) for counterfeiting.  £645

 

WTH-7835:  1567 Elizabeth 1st MILLED or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence.  Initial mark Lis, S.R. 2599.  A rare example of an overdate in the milled series.  When you consider that “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562.  This leaves 15% for all the other Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage”, you gain an insight into just how rare all non 1562 milled coins are.  I don't tend to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences as they are invariably overpriced.  Queen Elizabeth 1st herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on 10th July 1561.  She met with Eloye Mestrelle and viewed his machinery.  The visit was reported to be six hours in length.  Eleven years later, Eloye Mestrelle was dismissed from the mint in 1572 and just six years after that, he was executed (hanged) for counterfeiting.  £465

 

WTH-7907:  1567 Elizabeth 1st MILLED or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence.  Initial mark Lis, S.R. 2599.  When you consider that “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562.  This leaves 15% for all the other Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage”, you gain an insight into just how rare all non 1562 milled coins are.  I don't tend to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences as they are invariably overpriced.  Queen Elizabeth 1st herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on 10th July 1561.  She met with Eloye Mestrelle and viewed his machinery.  The visit was reported to be six hours in length.  Eleven years later, Eloye Mestrelle was dismissed from the mint in 1572 and just six years after that, he was executed (hanged) for counterfeiting.  This coin has provenance going right back to August 1957.  The straight 67 is rarer than the 68/7 overdate.  £465

 

WTH-7882:  1567 Elizabeth 1st Milled or Machine-Pressed Silver Sixpence with Excellent Provenance.  Initial mark lis, small crude bust, S.R. 2599.  Borden & Brown 37 (O1/R1) - type 7c.  The following, which I highlight at the top of the Elizabeth 1st page, is fact:  “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562.  This leaves 15% for all the other Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage.”  It doesn’t take a statistician to see that for S.R. to state that a 1567 milled 6d is commoner than a 1562 6d is beyond ridiculous (I don't tend to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences as they are invariably overpriced).  Queen Elizabeth 1st herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on 10th July 1561.  She met with Eloye Mestrelle and viewed his machinery.  The visit was reported to be six hours in length.  Eleven years later, Eloye Mestrelle was dismissed from the mint in 1572 and just six years after that, he was executed (hanged) for counterfeiting.  Old tickets here: Ex Spink 1948 and residing in the same family until recently.  A rarer date coin.  £495

 

WTH-7836:  1568/7 Elizabeth 1st MILLED or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence.  Initial mark Lis, S.R. 2599.  A rare example of an overdate in the milled series.  When you consider that “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562.  This leaves 15% for all the other Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage”, you gain an insight into just how rare all non 1562 milled coins are.  I don't tend to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences as they are invariably overpriced.  Queen Elizabeth 1st herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on 10th July 1561.  She met with Eloye Mestrelle and viewed his machinery.  The visit was reported to be six hours in length.  Eleven years later, Eloye Mestrelle was dismissed from the mint in 1572 and just six years after that, he was executed (hanged) for counterfeiting.  Ex Arthur Fitts' collection.  £545

 

WTH-7837:  1568/7 Elizabeth 1st MILLED or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence.  Initial mark Lis, S.R. 2599.  A rare example of an overdate in the milled series.  When you consider that “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562.  This leaves 15% for all the other Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage”, you gain an insight into just how rare all non 1562 milled coins are.  I don't tend to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences as they are invariably overpriced.  Queen Elizabeth 1st herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on 10th July 1561.  She met with Eloye Mestrelle and viewed his machinery.  The visit was reported to be six hours in length.  Eleven years later, Eloye Mestrelle was dismissed from the mint in 1572 and just six years after that, he was executed (hanged) for counterfeiting.  £795

 

WTH-7648:  1568/7 Elizabeth 1st MILLED or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence.  Small bust with ear showing, initial mark Lis, S.R. 2599.  A much rarer year although I’ve just, for the very first time, noticed that S.R. rate 1568 as commoner than 1562!!  Now Sovereign Rarity’s price guide has many strange anomalies riddled throughout (I’m being diplomatic!) but I have to say, this one may well take the biscuit!  I don’t take too much notice of S.R. pricing as it’s all very general, based on the commonest variety (ie there are more than x10 different varieties for 1651 Commonwealth shillings but S.R. only give one price, which will be for the very commonest of those date varieties) and nearly always priced too low, which is probably why I’ve never noticed this 62 v’s 68 thing before.  It should always be remembered that S.R. is just a guide, not a set-in-stone-bible, although the differentials between varieties should be reasonably accurate, which is definitely NOT the case here.  The following, which I highlight at the top of the Elizabeth 1st page, is fact:  “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562.  This leaves 15% for all the other Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage.”  It doesn’t take a statistician to see that for S.R. to state that a 1568 milled 6d is commoner than a 1562 6d is beyond ridiculous.  (I don't tend to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences as they are invariably overpriced).  Queen Elizabeth 1st herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on 10th July 1561.  She met with Eloye Mestrelle and viewed his machinery.  The visit was reported to be six hours in length.  Eleven years later, Eloye Mestrelle was dismissed from the mint in 1572 and just six years after that, he was executed (hanged) for counterfeiting.  A rarer date coin.  Ex Spink.  £395

 

WTH-7801:  1568/7 Elizabeth 1st Machine Screw-Press Silver Sixpence.  Small bust with ear showing, initial mark Lis, S.R. 2599.  A much rarer year although I’ve just, for the very first time, noticed that S.R. rate 1568 as commoner than 1562!!  Now S.R.’s price guide has many strange anomalies riddled throughout (I’m being diplomatic!) but I have to say, this one may well take the biscuit!  I don’t take too much notice of S.R. pricing as it’s all very general, based on the commonest variety (ie there are more than x10 different varieties for 1651 Commonwealth shillings but S.R. only give one price, which will be for the very commonest of those date varieties) and nearly always priced too low, which is probably why I’ve never noticed this 62 v’s 68 thing before.  It should always be remembered that S.R. is just a guide, not a set-in-stone-bible, although the differentials between varieties should be reasonably accurate, which is definitely NOT the case here.  The following, which I highlight at the top of the Elizabeth 1st page, is fact:  “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562.  This leaves 15% for all the other Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage.”  It doesn’t take a statistician to see that for S.R. to state that a 1568 milled 6d is commoner than a 1562 6d is beyond ridiculous.  (I don't tend to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences as they are invariably overpriced).  Queen Elizabeth 1st herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on 10th July 1561.  She met with Eloye Mestrelle and viewed his machinery.  The visit was reported to be six hours in length.  Eleven years later, Eloye Mestrelle was dismissed from the mint in 1572 and just six years after that, he was executed (hanged) for counterfeiting.  This is an interesting, very late 1568 issue from dies that were failing, as evidenced from the three separate obverse die flaws.  I have never seen any more than a single die flaw before.  I suspect the pressure was reduced in the press in order to facilitate this die lasting the course as there are uncharacteristic corresponding poorly struck areas at 5 o’clock obv and 7 o’clock rev.  An interesting and rarer date coin.  Ex Spink.  £595

 

 

 

Threepences

 

WTH-9157 :  Rarer Denomination 1562 Elizabeth 1st MILLED Silver Tudor Threepence.  Tall narrow decorated bust with medium Rose, initial mark Star, Tower mint.  S.R.2603, DIG 3/B(5ii) - the variety where the 5 in the date is complete and NOT broken at the top horizontal.  Two points of interest on this fascinating coin:

1. The T in Elizabeth is a definite letter I.  This is a recorded error but never-the-less, on a milled or machine-made coin (where they knew they had to seriously impress to not just supersede the hammered coinage, but literally to survive at all against the way it had always been for many, many centuries - nobody really likes change!), why so sloppy?

2. The 2 in 1562 is unlike others (the norm being a fairly subtle connection of the lower horizontal to the diagonal.  This looks suspiciously like an overdate to me - a recycled 1561 reverse, altered at the die level to read 1562 but in the process producing a chunky number 2 as a result of the original underlying chunky number 1.  Basically, a 1562/1 coin.

The following, which I highlight at the top of the main Elizabeth 1st page, is fact:  “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562.  This leaves 15% for all the other Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage.”  This threepence was a miniscule issue at the Mestrel press and a tinier issue still when compared to the hammered threepences. Queen Elizabeth 1st herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on 10th July 1561.  She met with Eloye Mestrelle and viewed his machinery.  The visit was reported to be six hours in length.  Eleven years later, Eloye Mestrelle was dismissed from the mint in 1572 and just six years after that, he was executed (hanged) for counterfeiting.  A rare milled coin, a rarer still denomination and a perhaps even rarer coin in terms of the legend error and the potential overdate.  £695

Provenance:

ex Tim Owen (his older ticket)

 

 

 

Hammered Gold Issue

 

WAu-9160:  Elizabeth 1st Hammered Gold Half Angel.  Initial mark Latin Cross: 1580-81.  Tower (London) mint, fifth issue, no E and Rose above the cross, S.R.2527.  A rarer denomination than the full Angel which circulated at five shillings.  It is interesting to note that unlike earlier hammered gold coinage, as well as later Commonwealth gold, the half angels saw considerable circulation alongside the silver five shillings / crowns.  The economy, buoyant under Elizabeth 1st, was destined to enter a downward turn towards the end of the reign, thus gold coinage would be far less a part of the general economy.   Good provenance - old tickets here.  Rarely offered for sale these days.  £4,895

Provenance:

ex Seaby (old tickets), 1953?  £750

ex Tim Owen (ticket), sold 2012 for £2,500

ex HistoryInCoins....sold 2015 for £2,995

ex Scottish collection

 

 

 

Hammered Silver Issue

 

Halfcrowns

 

WTH-7690:  1601 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Halfcrown.  Seventh issue, S.R. 2583.  The Edward VI crowns and halfcrowns – primarily just eye-catching big coins to promote Edward’s restoration of the sterling standard (after Henry VIII’s escapades) in 1551 – didn’t really take off.  The German thaler, which was introduced actually before Elizabeth 1st was even born, and the Spanish dollar or piece of eight, was brought to the attention of the English mint towards the very end of the reign as a bullion coin for use with the East India Company.  Prior to 1600, the company had used foreign coinage and then the testern or Portcullis pieces for transportation of bullion, neither of which were well received by the monarchy, particularly the latter as it did not bear the queen’s portrait.  The large flans of these new crowns and halfcrowns were ideal for the engraver Charles Anthony to display his ionic portrait which pleased the queen enormously compared to the non portrait testerns.  This was either luck or great foresight as within 50 years, the halfcrown was the principle circulating coin in the English economy!  An interesting die variation with the sceptre pointing to the I of REGINA as opposed to the usual G.  £2,895

 

 

 

Shillings

 

WTH-9117:  Extremely Rare Elizabeth 1st Hammered Shilling.  Initial mark Martlet, second issue, 1560-61.  What makes this a very rare coin indeed is a combination of grade and the fact that this coin is a contemporary counterfeit.  The base metal core of the coin is evident where blistering over the centuries has occurred, as well as on the edge.  This would have been laminated with a decent silver plating, but obviously the combined metal value would have been much lower than an actual shilling, which is where the counterfeiter would have made his money.  I've seen two or three of these over the years and without exception, the extant silver plate is virtually non-existant.  This coin retains 98% of the original silvering.  Better still is the die with which they struck the prepared blank to create the actual coin.  Clearly this would have been a non-official, hand-made die, copying the official 3C bust, but the workmanship is truly outstanding - astonishing, in fact.  This would fool many people today, bar the base metal blisters, and would surely have fooled everyone back in the day!  I have never seen the like before, both in the quality of the die used and also in the almost unbelievable grade of the coin, not just in the 1560's, when this coin would have hit the streets of London but today, 460 years on!  I can't remember the last time I came across a coin that excited me, was in exceptionally good grade, and was relatively inexpensive.  £365 RESERVED (M.He. 1-4-25 Lay-Away)

 

WTH-8991:  Very Rare Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver FIRST ISSUE Shilling.  Wire inner circles only, bust 1B (Brown bust 2), initial mark Lis: 1st January 1559 to the Spring of 1560.  S.R. 2548.  A great rarity in the series and one that when it des turn up, which is hardly ever, invariably has issues, or at the very least is much worn through a combination of a poor obverse die (ie insufficient definition / depth on the portrait) and much circulation.  This coin is one of the best known examples, being part of the famous Lingford collection in 1949 and Chris Comber's impressive, more recent collection (dispersed DNW 2018), to which he was constantly upgrading but this coin he simply could not better.  Old tickets here.  Chris Comber gives this RRR rarity which is only one less R than the fabled undated sixpence to which he gave a rarity of RRRR.  An extremely rare coin, particularly so in this grade.  £1,550

Provenance:

Ex Herbert Muspratt Lingford collection (purchased March 1949)

Ex Chris Comber collection

Ex Tim Owen

 

WTH-7471:  1594-96 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Shilling.  Sixth Issue, initial mark Woolpack, S.R. 2577.  Bust 6B.  Scratches to the face (deliberate, contemporary graffiti) otherwise a good, solid example of a scarcer denomination.  £325

 

WTH-7905:  Elizabeth 1st Early Hammered Silver Shilling.  Initial mark Cross Crosslet, bust 3C, second issue, S.R. 2555.  Second issue Cross Crosslet hammered shillings were only struck for a total of 10 months (1st December 1560 to 24th October 1561) – interestingly, there was a 20 odd year hiatus before shillings were once again issued under Elizabeth 1st.  Minimal wear on this coin - shillings upwards were extremely hard to prepare dies for.  The legends bit was relatively easy but to cut a die with a view to getting a portrait onto a large piece of silver, using the hammering process, what a remarkably difficult undertaking and one that perhaps defeated the die sinkers most of the time.  £445

 

 

 

Sixpences

 

WTH-7456:  156Z/1 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Third & Fourth issues, initial mark Pheon, S.R. 2561.  1562 as a date represents a frequency of 1.8% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 1.4% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  1562 is the nineteenth rarest of all forty two dates.  An interesting die.  You might be thinking this was an error (a Z for a 2) but you’d be wrong.  1561 was a huge year for sixpence output, there being x17 different dies in use with several more prepared in case they needed them.  They didn’t and so when 1562 happened, one or two of those x17 dies that hadn’t broken were recycled, along with the unused 1561 “reserve” dies.  They decided a Z made a better number 2 until they saw sense.  There are fewer 156Z/1 dies recorded than straight 62 dies.  £265

 

WTH-7831:  1563/2 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Initial mark Pheon, third & fourth issue.  S.R. 2561.  This date only ever occurs as an overdate - they clearly had a lot of functional dies left over from 1562 which they adapted / recycled to make 1563 dies.  An unusual triple vertical dot arrangement after ELIZABETH - it's usually a double or occasionally a single dot.  1563 as a date represents a frequency of 0.6% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.4% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  1563 is the seventh rarest of all forty two dates - it was a plague year with a population mass exodus out of London, resulting in London commerce coming to a virtual standstill.  Only the people who could afford to escape the plague left London but then they were the very people generating commerce. Ex Mayfair Coins (1980) and thence to the famous Chris Comber collection (his ticket).An important coin in the sixpence series.  £425

 

WTH-8116:  1563/2 Elizabeth 1st Tudor Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Initial mark Pheon, third & fourth issue.  S.R. 2561.  This date only ever occurs as an overdate - they clearly had a lot of functional dies left over from 1562 which they adapted / recycled to make 1563 dies.  An unusual triple vertical dot arrangement after ELIZABETH - it's usually a double or occasionally a single dot.  1563 as a date represents a frequency of 0.6% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.4% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  1563 is the seventh rarest of all forty two dates - it was a plague year with a population mass exodus out of London, resulting in London commerce coming to a virtual standstill.  Only the people who could afford to escape the plague left London but then they were the very people generating commerce. An important coin in the sixpence series.  £385

 

WTH-7459:  1564 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Third & Fourth issues, initial mark Pheon, S.R. 2561b.  1564 (all varieties) as a date represents a frequency of 2.2% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 1.8% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins, but you also need to be aware that there are x14 recorded examples of all 1564 dies and ONLY ONE OF THOSE IS A STRAIGHT 64!!  This is a very rare coin and hugely underrated by most people.  £245

 

WTH-7460:  1565 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Third & Fourth issues, initial mark Rose, S.R. 2561b.  Old tickets here.  1565 as a date represents a frequency of 3.8% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 2.5% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  There was some impressive die life this year – only x5 dies are recorded compared to way more for previous years.  Also, even though 64 was a huge year where they must have had many left over dies, either partly used or reserve dies, there are no overdates for 1565.  £175

 

WTH-7316:  1565 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Third and fourth issue, initial mark Pheon, 1F bust variety – S.R. 2561.  Only five recorded dies.  1565 as a date represents a frequency of 3.8% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 2.5% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  £125

 

WTH-7832:  1565 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Initial mark Rose (started late 1565: 1st October), third & fourth issue.  S.R. 2561.  This date only ever occurs as a straight 65 - they clearly had no functional dies left over from 1564 with which they could adapt / recycle to make 1565 dies.  This is even more impressive when you learn that virtually all 1564 coins were recycled from old 1562 dies!  They had clearly got their act together after the fiasco of 1562 when they had dies by the bucket full that went unused that year.  1565 as a date represents a frequency of 3.8% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 2.5% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  It's a date you don't come across that often these days.  £235

 

WTH-7462:  1567 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Third & Fourth issues, initial mark Coronet, S.R. 2562.  1567 as a date represents a frequency of 6.6% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 4.8% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  £235

 

WTH-7705:  1568 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence.  Third issue, initial mark Coronet, S.R. 2562.  Ex C. Martin 1981, ex Chris Comber collection.  1568 as a date represents a frequency of 4.6% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 5.1% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  Outstanding grade.  £285

 

WTH-7772:  1572 Elizabeth 1st Tudor Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Initial mark Ermine, bust 4B, third & fourth issues, S.R. 2562.  This is an example of the UNCORRECTED die sinker’s error of the 2 in the date being both reversed and inverted.  Several recorded errors were made on various Elizabethan dies but I think this is the most unforgivable because even if you were illiterate, you’d surely notice an upside down, reversed 2 and if you didn’t, then surely the quality control people would flag it up?!  And for it to then go into production to not only strike coinage but for that coinage to then be deemed correct and good enough for distribution into general circulation…???!!!  It doesn’t seem possible but it certainly happened.  It obviously was quickly discovered and corrected because coins exist that are normal 2 struck over this inverted 2 die.  Ex Arthur Fitts’ collection.  £275

 

WTH-7464:  1573 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Third & Fourth issues, initial mark Acorn, S.R. 2563.  1573 as a date represents a frequency of 4.6% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 5.3% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  £185

 

WTH-7706:  1576 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence.  Third issue, initial mark Eglantine, S.R. 2563.  1576 as a date represents a frequency of 0.8% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 1.0% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  1576 is the sixteenth rarest of all forty two dates.  Strong reverse, especially date.  £125

 

WTH-8117:  1576 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence.  Third issue, initial mark Eglantine, S.R. 2563.  1576 as a date represents a frequency of 0.8% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 1.0% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  1576 is the sixteenth rarest of all forty two dates.  A very good grade coin with minor reverse graffiti.  £295

 

WTH-7599:  1577/6 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Initial mark Eglantine, third & fourth issues, S.R. 2563.  1577 as a date represents a frequency of 0.4% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.4% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  1577 is the sixth rarest of all forty two dates.  Whilst you can’t argue with the data, I would have placed 1577 at more like 4th or 5th, but that’s clearly anecdotal.  Interestingly, 1577, and to a lesser extent, 1576, are often thought of as common dates as they are both completely surrounded by commoner dates on a graph of extant recorded examples.  Interestingly, 1577 does not exist as a straight 77 – they are all overstruck on old recycled 1576 dies.  It is telling that very few 1577 sixpences were actually struck as they were winding down the Fourth coinage: not only is there a Fifth coinage 1578/7 variety (showing that they did actually produce a straight 1577 but didn’t use it), but there is also a Fifth coinage 1578/7/6 variety showing that the 1577/6 was clearly only used sparingly in 1577 as it was still viable in 1578, albeit with yet another alteration.  A very rare coin.  £425

 

WTH-7670:  1580 over 1579 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence.  Fifth coinage, bust 5A, initial mark Latin Cross, S.R. 2572.  Overdates, with altered initial marks, are found because too many dies were sunk in a year where less coinage was struck that was originally expected, often down to availability of bullion.  These old dies were effectively recycled up to three years later.  It is interesting to note that although changing the initial mark was obligatory, in line with the various pyx inspections, the date was not required to be changed.  They are actually quite rare in all coinages, but specifically for the fifth coinage, it only really happened three times.  When you think that 79 to be changed to 80 would have been twice the work, you begin to wonder why they bothered changing the date at all.  The overdate on this coin is very clear.  1580 as a date represents a frequency of 3.7% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 4.1% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  £225

 

WTH-7572:  1585 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Initial mark Escallop, sixth issue.  Only a single 1585 die recorded – two future overdates (1586/5 and 1587/6/5) are recorded which were basically recycled dies from previous years, ie they made more 1585 dies than they actually used.  1585 as a date represents a frequency of 1.4% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 2.1% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  1585 is the twentieth rarest of all forty two dates.  £145 

 

WTH-9073:  1588 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence.  Sixth issue, initial mark Crescent, S.R. 2578A.  1588 as a date represents a frequency of 0.2% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.2% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  1588 is the fourth rarest of all forty two dates.  The famous Spanish Armada date and although only 4th rarest in the “league table”, this date is arguably the most sought after of all dates.  If you check prices in previous (proper) coin auctions, you’ll see some very high prices, especially in the States, and don’t forget there’s 30% buyer’s commission on top of those prices.  Interestingly, this coin looks to have been a 15-- die where the final 8 has been added, presumably because this was a time of austerity where relatively few coins were struck; the thought being that these dies could be used over several years without the need to overdate.  I have since bought a 1588 6d (WTH-7833) where both number 8s look to have bee added to a 15-- die.  £485

 

WTH-8119:  1589 - final 9 over sideways 9 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence.  Sixth issue, initial mark Crescent, S.R. 2578A.  Note the two 9's are actually level with the 15 although both final digits were added to a finished 15-- die.  In some instances, only the final digit was added to a 158- die.  This was a time of austerity where relatively few coins were struck; the thought being that these dies could be used over several years without the need to overdate.  However, much more important is the final 9, it being overstruck over a sideways 9 and further, that upright 9 was struck over another upright 9.  Messrs. Brown, Comber & Wilkinson, the undisputed leading experts on all things numismatically linked to Elizabeth 1st, in their research paper (published 2006, updated 2012), do record this sideways 9 but not the second upright 9.  Interestingly, the same employee at the mint who thought a sideways 9 was a good idea to add to a 15-- die was probably the same one who in 1588 thought a sideways 8 was an equally good and acceptable idea!  1580 also has an 8 over a sideways 8.  After 1589, no more errors of this nature are recorded thus we can assume that he was either cured of his sideways view on things or moved out!  1589 as a date represents a frequency of 0.5% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.5% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  1589 is the eighth rarest of all forty two dates.  Ex Chris Comber collection.  £165

 

WTH-6713:  1589 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Initial mark Crescent, sixth issue.  S.R. 2578A.  1589 as a date represents a frequency of 0.5% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.5% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  1589 is the seventh rarest of all forty two dates.  £135

 

WTH-8121:  High Grade 1590 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence.  Sixth issue, initial mark Hand, S.R. 2578B.  1590 as a date represents a frequency of 1.0% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 1.2% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  1590 is the fourteenth rarest of all forty two dates.  Outstanding grade for a coin so late in the series.  Ex Chris Comber collection.  £465

 

WTH-7671:  1591 over 1590 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence.  Sixth coinage, bust 6C, initial mark Hand, S.R. 2578B.  Overdates, with altered initial marks, are found because too many dies were sunk in a year where less coinage was struck that was originally expected, often down to availability of bullion.  These old dies were effectively recycled up to three years later.  It is interesting to note that although changing the initial mark was obligatory, in line with the various pyx inspections, the date was not required to be changed.  1590 changed to 1591 is a strange one in that most of the 1590 sixpences issued were made from 1589 recycled dies and the rest were from straight 1590 dies.  They clearly didn’t issue many straight 1590 coins (it is a rarer year) because the dies were barely used – they took the 1591 dies, seeing they were still fresh, and altered them to produce 1591 coinage.  1591 as a date represents a frequency of 1.2% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 1.2% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  1591 is the fifteenth rarest of all forty two dates.  £255

 

WTH-7092:  1592 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Initial mark Tun, sixth issue.  S.R. 2578B. 1592 as a date represents a frequency of 2.5% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 2.4% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  £95

 

WTH-7560:  1593 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Sixth issue, initial mark Tun, bust 6C, S.R. 2578B.  Sometime cleaned.  Ex A. Travis collection.  1593 as a date represents a frequency of 2.5% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 2.4% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  Only x3 recorded straight 93 dies recorded.  These later dates are invariably lower grade and problematic but this coin is much above average.  £275

 

WTH-7805:  1594 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence  Sixth issue, initial mark Woolpack, which was in use 9th May 1594 to 13th February 1596.  The straight 94, of which this is very much an example, is less frequently seen than the commoner 1594/3 overdates.  Saying that, 94 is still overall a rare year: 1594 as a date represents a frequency of 2.6% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 2.6% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  Again, by this date, the quality of dies and the actual end product seemed to have been a far distant memory so it’s nice, not to say unusual, to see such a good grade example.  S.R. 2578B.  Impact mark or punch below the Queen’s ear.  Nicely toned.  £175

 

WTH-7319:  1596 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Sixth issue, initial mark Key, S.R. 2578B.  One of the rare years - 1596 as a date represents a frequency of 0.7% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 1.0% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  1596 is the eleventh rarest of all forty two dates.  A grand total of three recorded dies (one of which is 9/6, another being bereft of any initial mark whatsoever) illustrates just how rare a year this is.  Unusually for these rare later dates, this coin is actually very nice grade for issue.  £295

 

WTH-7806:  1596 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence  Sixth issue, initial mark Key, which was in use 13th February 1596 to 7th February 1599.  There were no overdates (ie recycled reverse dies) used for this rare year: 1596 as a date represents a frequency of 0.7% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 1.0% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  1596 is the eleventh rarest of all forty two dates.  The late 1590’s to the end in 1602 were poor years in terms of quality of dies and sixpence coinage, even more so than the 1580’s.  Anecdotally, the silver alloy content deteriorated as well, thereby not helping the state of the coinage.  Not the most photogenic of coins; it is, however, a very nice grade example of this rarer, late year, albeit afflicted with an inferior silver alloy, along with perhaps every other 1596 coin going.  A very nice and hard to find example.  £365

 

WTH-7709:  1597 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence.  Sixth issue, initial mark Key, S.R. 2578B.  1597 as a date represents a frequency of <0.04% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and <0.03% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  *** 1597 is the rarest of all forty two dates ***  I have only had one better through my hands in many, many years.  That was the Walter Wilkinson coin which now forms the backbone of a very impressive, growing collection and definitely not available.  A great rarity, especially in this grade.  £950

 

WTH-8122:  1597 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence.  Sixth issue, initial mark Key, S.R. 2578B.  Note the 97 digits are actually lower than they should be, indicating that both final digits were added to a finished 15-- die.  1597 as a date represents a frequency of <0.04% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and <0.03% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  *** 1597 is the rarest of all forty two dates ***  A great rarity.  £525

 

WTH-8031:  1599/8 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Initial mark a straight Anchor, Sixth issue, S.R. 2578B.  1599 as a date represents a frequency of 0.2% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.1% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  *** 1599 is the third rarest of all forty two dates ***   There was an economic depression during the final years of the sixteenth century, a factor hugely relevant in the rarity of this coin.  This led to a situation where there was an oversupply of dies, resulting in date alterations (we see 1599/8/6, 99/8 [this coin] and 99/6).  This scenario only started in 1598 as prior to that date, we see very little, if any overdating – even 1597 was a straight date.  More interesting still, this coin is an unrecorded 1599 (large final 9) over 1599 (small final 9) over 1598.  One die is recorded where BOTH the 9 and 8 of the date were overstruck with a large 9 punch but this is just the final digit and a smaller 9 is indicated in terms of the trailing tail.  I have to say that this trailing tail may or may not be a small 9 but even if it isn't, this is still unrecorded in that only a single large 9 was used.  Ex Ewerby Hoard.  Not a particularly pleasing coin but nevertheless hugely interesting, very rare and benefiting from coming from that well known, recent hoard – and by the way, this large hoard was very much made up of worn coins from circulation with apparently zero consideration given for any part of it to be “nice coins” – these were the coins available to the individual who put that hoard together at that time.  This 1599/8 is fairly representative across the board in terms of grade, showing us that the general coinage in circulation in the 1640’s – the given date of this hoard – was poor.  It’s frustrating when people demand high grade, choice sixpences and complain that all see are “battered, low grade” examples.  The Chris Comber and Walter Wilkinson Elizabeth 1st collections had their fair share of coins looking like this, even after many decades of collecting and upgrading.  A rare coin.  £375

 

WTH-9074:  1600/159- Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Sixth issue, initial mark 0, bust 6B - S.R. 2578B.  For the vast bulk of Elizabethan coinage, little or no foresight had been used regarding dates and initial marks, resulting in glaring overdates when the old dies were used again (recycled) in subsequent years, for example the famous 1578/7/6.  There are many others.  The penny dropped at the mint, eventually, that perhaps sinking dies but omitting initial marks and with only partial dates (those to be added when the dies were brought into use), might be a good idea.  Amusingly, this practice was adopted in, wait for it, 1599 - the most inappropriate time possible because the following year was 1600 with three digits changing as opposed to usually one and rarely two!  Rather than throw away the prepared 159- "future-proof" dies, they decided to alter the middle two digits from -59- to -60-.  The first digit (thankfully!) didn't need changing and all they had to do was add the 0 to the end of the date, as well as add the initial mark in the gap provided.  Thus we have 1600 over 159- coins.  Interestingly, these 159- dies were also used in 1601 but even after adding the final digit and changing the middle two, they discovered that the first and last digits were so far apart in time that they were actually from different punches and so different!  Demand for English coin was much in decline at this period so these were tiny mintages: 1600 as a date represents a frequency of 0.4% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.1% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  1600 is the fifth rarest of all forty two dates.  I have to say that I don't see 1600 as being as abundant as that, and I'm far from the only person saying that.  A rare coin indeed.  £475

 

WTH-7558:  1601 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Seventh issue, initial mark 1, S.R. 2584.  Toned.  1601 as a date represents a frequency of 0.6% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.7% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  1601 is the tenth rarest of all forty two dates.  These later dates are invariably lower grade and problematic but this coin certainly bucks that trend.  £285

Provenance:

ex Ken Bressett collection,

ex H. Mitchell ($140 twenty years ago)

 

WTH-9141:  1601 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Seventh issue, initial mark 1, 29th July 1601 to 14th May 1602.  S.R. 2585.  1601 as a date represents a frequency of 0.6% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.7% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  1601 is the tenth rarest of all forty two dates. This is an interesting coin in that it's a straight 1601, rather than an earlier 159- recycled die where the middle 5 and 9 were overstruck with a 6 and a 0.  The final 1 would have been added at the same time.  A large percentage of 1601 sixpences were from recycled 159- dies (even after they'd recycled many of those dies for the 1600 coinage!) as the coinage output for the late 1590's was far below what the dies were set up to produce.  As such, this coin was probably struck late into the issue, early 1602.  Of note is the 0 in the date - it's unusually small compared to the rest of the date.  They also felt the need to strike it twice - absolutely no idea why they'd do that, unless they thought they were using a larger 0 on the second strike?! - which implies the actual die was a 16-- die, not a 160- die, with the final two digits (as well as the initial marks) being added after the main striking.  Interesting though that is, of perhaps more importance is the grade.  These later sixpences were notoriously poor in terms of dies and strike (and sometimes even the silver alloy) compared with the earlier dates.  This coin is actually a pleasing VF example for issue and thus rare.  £465

Provenance:

ex John Noel Simpson collection

ex Spink

 

WTH-7174:  1602 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.  Seventh issue, initial mark 2 – the last ever date in the lengthy Elizabeth 1st sixpence series.  S.R. 2585.  1602 as a date represents a frequency of 1.9% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 2.1% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.  Sold with an auction printout as well as a collector’s cabinet ticket.  £125

 

 

 

Groats

 

WTH-6798:  Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Groat.  Initial mark Lis, rarer first issue.  S.R. 2551A.  These bust 1G first issue hammered groats were only struck for a very few months – Spring 1560 to 8th November 1560.  This is a really interesting and somewhat rare coin as both the obverse and reverse dies were literally the much smaller first issue halfgroat dies.  £245

 

WTH-6723:  Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Groat.  Initial mark Lis, rarer first issue.  S.R. 2551A.  These bust 1G first issue hammered groats were only struck for a very few months – Spring 1560 to 8th November 1560.  This is a really interesting and somewhat rare coin as both the obverse and reverse dies were literally the much smaller first issue halfgroat dies.  £225

 

WTH-6572:  Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Groat.  Initial mark Martlet, bust 1F, second issue, S.R. 2556.  Second issue Martlet hammered groats were only struck for a total of 10 months (9th December 1560 to 24th October 1561) – interestingly, the Martlets and Cross Crosslets were the last hammered groats issued under her reign, even though Elizabeth reigned for a further 40+ years.  £255

 

WTH-7904:  Elizabeth 1st Early Hammered Silver Groat or Fourpence.  Initial mark Martlet, bust 1F, second issue, S.R. 2556.  Second issue Martlet hammered groats were only struck for a total of 10 months (9th December 1560 to 24th October 1561) – interestingly, the Martlets and Cross Crosslets were the last hammered groats issued under her reign, even though Elizabeth reigned for a further 40+ years.  This is a beautiful coin, being excellent grade, centrally struck, attractively toned, etc etc.  £475

 

 

 

Threepences

 

WTH-7300:  1561 Elizabeth 1st Rare Large Flan Hammered Silver Threepence.  Third and Fourth Issues of 1561-77, rose behind Queen, reverse dated.  Large 15mm flan (in fact, this one is nearer to 16mm), S.R. 2564.  Creased and straightened, with some resultant cracking, as so many of these newly introduced issues were – the public were still on hightened alert for fakes after the numismatic escapades of Elizabeth’s father, Henry VIII, and her bother, Edward VI, although to be fair, the early issues of Edward VI, extremely debased as they were, had very little to do with the Edward.  It is unusual to see dated threepences for the 1560’s but they obviously do exist.  1561 was something of a prolific year for threepences BUT, this very first issue of 1561, in fact the very first Elizabeth 1st threepence issued), with it’s large flan, is represented by a single die only.  Brown, Comber & Wilkinson postulate that this large flan threepence was a two month trial period of experimentation.  The start date of production was 26th October 1561 and the end date – the date where they decided to change to the smaller flans, was December 1561 or early January 1562.  A rare and important coin.  £345

 

WTH-6904:  1561 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Dated Threepence.  Third & fourth issues, S.R. 2565.  Initial mark pheon – only in use from 26th October 1561 (to 30th Sept 1565) and is rarely seen on this denomination with this initial mark.  The very first dated threepence issued under Elizabeth 1st.  £165

 

WTH-7608:  156Z/1 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Threepence.  Third & fourth issues, initial mark Pheon, S.R. 2565.  An interesting die.  You might be thinking this was an error (a Z for a 2) but you’d be wrong.  1561 was a huge year for sixpence output as well as threepences, but not on the same scale.  Like the sixpences, some of the 61 dies that hadn’t broken were recycled, along with the unused 1561 “reserve” dies.  They decided a Z made a better number 2 – there were no 1562/1 threepences and indeed, there was even a straight 156Z issued when they’d recycled all the old 1561 dies.  It was midway through 1562 that the decision was taken to change the Z for a proper 2.  This Z for 2 was actually nothing new as the earlier Edward VI crowns also used a Z for a 2.  Sold with an old ticket that (incorrectly) states 156Z/2.   A nice grade coin.  £135

 

WTH-7312:  1563 over 2 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Threepence.  Third & fourth issues, initial mark Pheon, S.R. 2565.  Just like the sixpence, 1563 is one of the rarest dates in the entire series.  There are only x2 dies recorded by Brown, Comber & Wilkinson (2006) for 1563 and further, only one of those is this overdate.  Ex Dupree (a well respected collection) and ex Capozollo.  A rare coin.  £245

 

WTH-6791:  1564 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Threepence.  Initial mark Pheon / Broad Arrow.  Third and fourth issues, S.R. 2565.  A rarer date.  £95

 

WTH-7287:  1566 Rare Date Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Threepence.  Initial mark Portcullis.  Third and fourth issues, smaller flan, regular bust, S.R. 2565.  Not so rare in sixpences but when you consider that there were only TWO 1566 threepence dies in use, with NO overdates (2006 data), it’s rare in threepences.  A general rule of thumb you may wish to note is that 1560’s Elizabeth 1st coins, bar sixpences, are rarer.  This date is an extremely rare year.  Excellent grade - much better in the hand than the images suggest, hence the extra cheap camera phone image I’ve included.  £265

 

WTH-5797:  1567 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Threepence.  Initial mark Coronet.  A rarer pre 1570’s date.  S.R. 2566.  £155

 

WTH-7418:  1568 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Threepence in Higher Grade.  Third and fourth issues (although Wilkinson, Comber & Brown go further by designated this as Third Coinage only), initial mark Coronet.  S.R. 2566.  I’ve been asked several times about the odd looking 8 in 1568 coinage.  It looks for all it’s worth to be an 8 over 7, but in fact they are all straight 68 dates unless you can see the ghosting of the angled diagonal of the 7 under the 8.  The die sinkers simply gave the 8 a flat top.  This coin benefits from yet another unusual feather in that the bottom circle of the 8 is broken!  There is a rarer variety where the flat top of the 8 is on the bottom, ie an inverted 8 but interestingly, this coin is actually rarer than the inverted 8 3d types!  1568 threepences utilised only three dies – 68/7 (the 8 being inverted), 68 (the 8 being inverted), and a 1568 with “normal” flat topped 8, meaning the flat topped 8 1568 threepence is rarer by 2:1.  An interesting coin and much, much better grade than normally seen.  £225

 

WTH-7088:  1570 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Threepence.  Initial mark Castle, third and fourth issues, S.R. 2566. Ex Eccles collection.  £95

 

WTH-7377:  1571 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Threepence.  Third and fourth issues, initial mark Castle.  S.R. 2566.  A very pleasing example.  £185

 

WTH-7417:  1572 (2 over inverted 2) Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Threepence.  Third and fourth issues (although Wilkinson, Comber & Brown go further by designated this as Third Coinage only), initial mark Ermine.  S.R. 2566.  A really interesting die sinker’s error where the final 2 of the date was originally inverted or upside down.  Quality control picked up on this (ie someone happened to notice it!) and so rather than start a new die from scratch, they simply put a correctly orientated 2 over the top of the error.  This is a single die (you’ll be pleased to hear the mistake was not repeated!) and can be chronologically attributed to the very first issue of 1572, ie 19th April onwards.  £185

 

WTH-6669:  1573 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Threepence.  Initial mark Acorn.  Third and fourth issues, S.R. 2566.  Acorn was only used for 6 months in total (1st November 1573 - 25th May 1574) so this year and initial mark combination were only in operation for x2 months.  It is a rare initial mark but coupled with this date, it is rarer still.  £115

 

WTH-6649:  1574 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Threepence.  Initial mark Eglantine.  Third and fourth issues, S.R. 2566.  Very nice grade.  £139

 

WTH-7301:  1575/4 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Threepence.  Third and fourth issue, initial mark Eglantine, ear showing.  S.R. 2566.  A very nice grade coin but perhaps of more interest is the overdate: 1575/4.  Brown, Comber & Wilkinson published that only a single recorded 75/4 die was known in 2006.  In the intervening years, more examples have been unearthed resulting in x3 dies now being known and a miniscule 9 recorded examples of this overdate only.  For those interested, Eglantine spanned 29th May 1574 to 13th July 1578 so it is clear to see what happened – as the year turned to 1575, the 74 Eglantine dies were still good enough to use, thus initial mark Eglantine was able to remain and a simple date adjustment to the die (although if that’s all they had to do, you have to question the skill of the die sinker based on the result!) sufficed.  £175

 

WTH-7249:  1575 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Threepence.  Initial mark Eglantine, third & fourth issues, regular bust, S.R. 2566.  This particular initial mark was relatively long-lived, being introduced 29th May 1574 and shelved 13th July 1578.  However, 1575 dated coins are represented by a single die only.  This is most surprising until we realise that there were actually plenty of 1575 dies sunk, but they were not used in 1575.  There is a 1575/4, which I only mention for context.  The bulk of the 1575 unused reverse dies were: 1576/5, 1577/5, 1577/6/5, 1578/7/5.  An unusually high grade example and a rare date / im combination.  Rare on both counts.  £235

 

WTH-7389:  1576/5 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Threepence.  Initial mark Eglantine, third & fourth issues.  S.R. 2566.  A rarer year with only one straight 76 die and this modified 76 over 75 die according to Brown, Comber & Wilkinson.  £165

 

WTH-7378:  1579 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Threepence.  Fifth issue, initial mark Greek Cross.  S.R. 2573.  Just the single die pairing being recorded by Comber, Wilkinson & Brown, although there was another pair prepared which were not used in 1579 but were overdated and used in 1580.  This coin is not far off being as struck, although the obverse strike quality could have been better.  £195

 

 

 

Halfgroats

 

WTH-7573:  1560-61 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Halfgroat.  Initial mark Martlet, second issue, S.R. 2557.  Collectors will be aware that of all the smaller denominations, the halfgroats suffered most in terms of clipping, wear and sometimes the quality of actual coinage leaving the mint.  Finding a really nice halfgroat is virtually impossible whereas pennies, and even the fractions, are relatively abundant.  Sold with collector’s cabinet ticket together with an information printout.  £155

 

WTH-7313:  1584-86 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Halfgroat.  Sixth issue, initial mark Escallop, S.R. 2579.  Collectors will be aware that of all the smaller denominations, the halfgroats suffered most in terms of clipping, wear and sometimes the quality of actual coinage leaving the mint.  Finding a really nice halfgroat is virtually impossible whereas pennies, and even the fractions, are relatively abundant.  £175

 

WTH-6704:  Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Halfgroat.  Initial mark 1, penultimate coinage of the seventh issue, 29th July 1601 – 14th May 1602.  S.R. 2586.  Full flan, clear legends, and very nice grade.  The obverse is double struck on the bust.  £65

 

WTH-7488:  1601 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Halfgroat.  Seventh issue, initial mark 1.  S.R. 2586.  Nice grade and sold with a detailed annotated coin envelope.  £125

 

WTH-7646:  Elizabeth 1st Tudor Hammered Silver Halfgroat.   Seventh and final issue with initial mark 1 so 1601.  Further image here.  London mint, S.R. 2579.  Ex Shaun Aldom collection.  £185

 

WTH-8029:  1560-61 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Halfgroat.  Initial mark Martlet, second issue, S.R. 2557.  Collectors will be aware that of all the smaller denominations, the halfgroats suffered most in terms of clipping, wear and sometimes the quality of actual coinage leaving the mint.  Finding a really nice halfgroat is virtually impossible whereas pennies, and even the fractions, are relatively abundant.  A really nice example that evaded the best efforts of the Tudor and Stuart clippers!  £185

 

 

 

Three Halfpence

 

WTH-6970:  1561 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Three Halfpence. Initial mark Pheon – S.R. 2569.  1561, although third and fourth issue, is the very first date ever for this rarer denomination.  £135

 

WTH-6643:  1573 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Three Halfpence – a very rare x2 month only issue.  Initial mark Acorn – commenced operation on 1st November 1573 so very late on in 1573.  S.R. 2569.  An uncommon denomination with a very rare date / initial mark combination.  £185

 

WTH-6825:  1575 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Three Halfpence.  Initial mark eglantine.  S.R. 2569.  A relatively high grade example of a dated, less common denomination Elizabeth 1st silver coin.  Reported to be part of an old hoard – I only managed to buy a couple of the coins, the other being a 1561 three halfpence which is now sold.  £185

 

 

 

Pennies

 

WTH-7360:  Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Penny.  Third & fourth issue, initial mark Crescent, 1587-89.  S.R. 2580.  Ex Dr E. Burstall collection.  £69

 

 

 

Three Farthings

 

WTH-7332:  1561 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Three Farthings.  The three farthings – a bizarre dated fractional denomination – started in 1561 and ended in 1582 (with just x15 dates used), never to see the numismatic light of day again.  Interestingly, the Elizabethan public would not have been as flabbergasted at the introduction of this odd coin as perhaps we are: Irish base coinage was circulating at this time in England at 25% face value and the earlier English base issue halfgroats were officially reduced in September 1560 as, wait for it… three farthings.  The public of the day were well aware of this required fractional calculation.  Only three different dies recorded for this date.  Initial mark Pheon, which didn’t even start production until the end of the year in 26th October 1561!!  This coin ex Dr Tony Abramson (he paid £85 in 1989), ex Leeds Museum Winter 1994/5 display and ex Spink, the latter having been tasked with dispersing the Abrahamson collection in 2021.  Tickets here.  S.R. 2571.  A most interesting coin.  £265

 

WTH-7432:  1562 Elizabeth I Hammered Silver Three Farthings.  Initial mark pheon, third and fourth coinage.  S.R. 2571.  A very rare date for this denomination as for the straight 2, there was only the single die in use at the tail end of the year (prior to this they were using recycled 1561 dies, ie 1562/1).  It got so little usage in 1562 that in was recycled in 1564 (there was no issue of this denomination in 1563) as a 1564/2.  The three farthings wasn’t even worth a penny and yet they went to a great deal of effort to create the dies for this unlikely fractional unit, incorporating a date and really working on sinking dies on an almost microscopic level, especially when you consider they only had daylight or candlelight and with little of today’s magnification techniques.  Die sinkers in particular often lost their eyesight in later life, and of course, “later life” in Tudor times was probably around 40 or younger!  The three farthings – a bizarre dated fractional denomination – started in 1561 and ended in 1582 (with just x15 dates used), never to see the numismatic light of day again.  Interestingly, the Elizabethan public would not have been as flabbergasted at the introduction of this odd coin as perhaps we are: Irish base coinage was circulating at this time in England at 25% face value and the earlier English base issue halfgroats were officially reduced in September 1560 as, wait for it… three farthings.  The public of the day were well aware of this required fractional calculation.  An iconic denomination, unique to Elizabeth 1st,    £265

 

WTH-7434:  1575 over 5 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Three Farthings.  Initial mark eglantine, third and fourth coinage.  S.R. 2571.  Rare over-date, completely unrecorded by Comber, Wilkinson.  1575 was a single die year with the same die in use in the following year as a modified / recycled 1576/5, thus showing that very few 1575 three halfpence were struck, and a further two 1575 dies, which were prepared but never used in that year, used in 1578 (1578/5), 1579 (1579/5) and 1581 (1581/75).  The three farthings wasn’t even worth a penny and yet they went to a great deal of effort to create the dies for this unlikely fractional unit, incorporating a date and really working on sinking dies on an almost microscopic level, especially when you consider they only had daylight or candlelight and with little of today’s magnification techniques.  Die sinkers in particular often lost their eyesight in later life, and of course, “later life” in Tudor times was probably around 40 or younger!  The three farthings – a bizarre dated fractional denomination – started in 1561 and ended in 1582 (with just x15 dates used), never to see the numismatic light of day again.  Interestingly, the Elizabethan public would not have been as flabbergasted at the introduction of this odd coin as perhaps we are: Irish base coinage was circulating at this time in England at 25% face value and the earlier English base issue halfgroats were officially reduced in September 1560 as, wait for it… three farthings.  The public of the day were well aware of this required fractional calculation.  An iconic denomination, unique to Elizabeth 1st.  £295

 

 

 

Halfpennies

 

WTH-7497:  1587-89 Elizabeth 1st Milled Silver Halfpenny.  Sixth issue, initial mark Crescent.  S.R. 2581.  Ex David Rogers’ collection.  I had a similar coin from the famous Chris Comber collection and on his ticket, he had Crescent down as a “Rare Mark”.  For those collectors interested in marrying up coins with historical events, 1588 is the date of the Spanish Armada.  £145

 

WTH-7913:  1602 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Portcullis Halfpenny.  Initial mark 2, seventh issue, S.R. 2588.  It is interesting to note that the halfpenny was a late addition to the varied Elizabethan portfolio of denominations, being introduced post 1582 in the sixth coinage.  Only a single pair of dies was used throughout the reign, and indeed the same die pair was used very early on under James 1st.  During 1601, the obverse die became damaged and was repaired.  All subsequent coins show the repair (left hand side of the portcullis - no bolt connecting the third horizontal bar to the second vertical bar), including the James 1st issue.  This coin has no such repair and so is one of those very interesting contemporary counterfeits.  These are superbly done but to be fair, it was the easiest coin to copy.  Ex Chris Comber collection.  What a coin!  £195

 

WTH-7951:  Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Portcullis Halfpenny.  Sixth issue, Tower (London) mint, initial mark A, 1582-84, S.R. 2581.  A tiny Tudor coin, although not the tiniest, being extremely well struck and in very good grade.  Ex Mike Vosper ticket with an anomalous description but the correct S.R. number, conceivably indicating a ticket dated to before S.R. changed the issue groupings around.  £155

 

WTH-8114:  Elizabeth 1st Tudor Hammered Silver Portcullis Halfpenny.  Initial mark Key, sixth issue, 1595-8, Tower mint, S.R. 2581.  A tiny coin but not the tiniest - that honour goes to a farthing issued by Elizabeth's father, Henry VIII.  I have one in stock which will find its way onto this sight soon.  £95

 

 

“Other”

 

WTH-7390:  Elizabeth 1st Queen Under Canopy Copper Jetton or Medalet.  Struck under the reign of King James 1st, 1610-15, by Hans Krauwinkel at Nuremberg.  All “monarch under canopy” jettons are rare.  Ex Porter (1994), ex Walter Wilkinson.  £145

 

WTH-9110:  1589 Elizabeth 1st Jetton or Medalet - DEFEAT OF THE SPANISH ARMADA.  As ever, much imagery: a pious Elizabeth 1st, seated, holding a prayer book, and a reverse suggesting that England is an innocent green tree supporting young, nesting birds whilst being attacked by the hawkish Spanish.  Medallic Illustrations 153/128, Dugn 3230.  May 1588 witnessed a Spanish fleet consisting of about 130 ships with about 8,000 seamen and possibly as many as 19,000 soldiers leaving Lisbon en route for England.  It was a formidable attack force - they termed it the Invincible Armada - which was four years in the making but which ultimately failed.  Julius Caesar's two invasions of Britain in 55 and 54 BC failed mainly because of the weather but whilst the Spanish Armada failed in part due to bad weather, it was bad tactics with bad luck that defeated the Spanish Armada.  It's quite surprising that it took a year to prepare the dies and even longer to get the medals out to the public.  A high grade example - remember, this is 1589 and copper is a soft metal.  £335

Provenance

ex S & B Coins (Simon Monks & Brian Reeds)1992

ex Baldwin's

 

WTH-9111:  1585 Elizabeth 1st Jetton or Medalet - ASSISTANCE TO THE UNITED PROVINCES.  As ever, much imagery: Elizabeth 1st, enthroned, gives roses to two deputies - "THE SOUL IS SLAIN BY THE NECTAR OF THE (ENGLISH) ROSE".  The reverse depicts two Spaniards eating hay along with a donkey and an ass: "I DESPISE AMBROSIA; I EAT HAY".  Medallic Illustrations 133/86, Dugn 3044.  Europe asked England to step in and help, which she did, and successfully - the Rose of England is compared to the immortalising nectar of the gods.  The Spaniards, who refused the Ambrosia of England, were reduced to absolute want, being glad to obtain even the food fit only for cattle.  A high grade example - remember, this is 1585 and copper is a soft metal.  £335 RESERVED (M.He.25-3-25 Lay-Away)

Provenance

ex S & B Coins (Simon Monks & Brian Reeds)1995

ex Baldwin's

 

WTH-9112:  1586 Elizabeth 1st SILVER Jetton or Medalet - ASSISTANCE TO THE UNITED PROVINCES.  As ever, much imagery: Elizabeth 1st, enthroned, attended by Leicester, presenting English swords to two attendants from the United Provinces.  The Earl of Leicester was a staunch Protestant and was close to the queen.  The reverse shows a sword piercing the clouds, meaning that no matter how good the sword of Elizabeth, a reliance upon the word of God must be their mainstay.  Medallic Illustrations 133/87, Dugn 3096.  Europe asked England to step in and help, which she did, and successfully - the Rose of England is compared to the immortalising nectar of the gods.  The Spaniards, who refused the Ambrosia of England, were reduced to absolute want, being glad to obtain even the food fit only for cattle.  A high grade, rare silver example - remember, this is 450 years old.  £495 RESERVED (M.He.25-3-25 Lay-Away)

Provenance

ex S & B Coins (Simon Monks & Brian Reeds)1997

ex Baldwin's