Edward VI (1547 - 1553) Read about Edward VI
Hammered Gold
WAu-9161: Edward VI - Spectacular
Portrait - Hammered Gold Half Sovereign.
Initial mark Martlet: 1550. Southwark (London) mint, second period, January 1549
to April 1550 so this coin very much the latter part of the second period. Crowned bust -
the earlier issue had Edward without a crown.
S.R.2438. Sold
13 years ago for £5,626 - see ticket here. An impressive coin with
much eye-appeal. Very rare. £7,895
Provenance:
ex St
James Auction, £2012, £5,625
ex HistoryInCoins, 2015, £6,500
ex
Scottish collection
Hammered Silver
Shillings
Second Debased Issue
WTH-9232:
An Absolutely
Outstanding Edward VI Hammered Silver Shilling. Second period (January 1549 to April 1550), second
debased issue. Initial mark Y. Tower (London) mint. Dated 1550. The Tim
Owen ticket points out that this coin has an "Unusual Portrait", and
indeed it does as it is not listed in Coins of England (formerly Spink, now
S.R.). They list Busts 1 and 2 (along
with the Durham House bust) for the first issue and busts
3, 4 and 5 for the second issue. This
coin is none of those, instead attributed as "Bispham
bust 5". Please note, S.R. bust 5
is not this coin, instead, to utterly confuse us all, S.R. bust 5 is Bispham but 4! Bispham bust 5, this coin, has hair swept forward from
behind the ear together with a fastener or brooch just above the shoulder. All that aside, this
coin is a superb example of what is virtually always a horrible issue, not
least as a result of the debased nature of the silver content, inherited from Edward's
father, Henry VIII. Choice
and rare. £1,395
Provenance:
ex Tim Owen
WTH-9139:
Edward VI
Hammered Silver Shilling. Second
debased issue, initial mark Arrow, dated 1549.
Tower
mint. S.R. 2466.
Tall narrow bust with a small crown. Second period, bust 5. A ridiculously large W in
EDWARD with a very small RD to boot.
Excellent grade for issue. Well centre, full flan and good edges. £650
Provenance:
Ex Tim
Owen
Third "Fine Silver" Issue
WTH-7950:
Edward VI
Hammered Fine Silver Issue Shilling.
Initial mark Tun - the more
interesting variety with x4 pellets surrounding the obverse im
and none surrounding the reverse.
Tower (London) mint, 1551-53, following on for
the debased issues of earlier Edward VI and later Henry VIII. Indeed, this Third Period Fine Silver issue
was literally the finest ever issued under the Tudors, which is impressive considering
the 1551 Third Base Issue was probably the very worst under the Tudors! S.R.
2482. A pleasing coin with
excellent eye-appeal, being altogether better than the majority of examples you
come across. £465
WTH-8023: Edward VI Fine Silver
Issue Hammered Shilling. Initial mark Tun, third period, fine
silver issue of 1551-3, London mint, S.R. 2482. Lost very soon after it was issued from the mint
but lost to the plough soil so although VF, which is actually rare to see in
these shillings, there are associated surface marks. £435
Sixpences
WTH-9132:
1551 Edward VI Hammered
Silver Sixpence - an Extraordinary example! Fine silver issue of 1551-3, initial mark y, London mint, S.R. 2483. A pleasing example
of this attractive and sought after issue which is rarer than the shillings
and, just like the shillings, often presents as problematic - damaged, bent,
worn etc. Some damage is undoubtedly
down to a very sceptical public in the early 1550's who
had lived through 50+ years of debased coinage thanks to Henry VIII. They would be disbelieving of these fine
silver coins and so would bite them and bend them to test they weren't
fakes. This coin is centrally pierced,
strongly implying that it was done so under the governance of Sir Isaac Newton
himself, in 1696 at the Great Re-Coinage.
Hammered coinage in England was phased out at the restoration
of the monarchy in 1660 and was officially ended in 1662 with the introduction
of Charles II milled silver coins.
Whilst no more hammered coins were minted post 1662, the old hammered
coinage was still legal tender; hammered and milled running side by side,
although much of it was battered and bruised through shear over-usage, not to
mention seriously underweight through clipping.
In 1696, although hammered coinage was still popular with the public, it
was decided that enough was enough – all circulating hammered coinage was to be
assessed by the mint. Anything
substandard was to be exchanged for the new milled coinage and anything in high
enough grade and, most importantly, of the correct weight, was allowed to
circulate for a few years more. This
latter cohort was identified as “of still legal tender” by the addition of a
central punch or piercing administered by the mint. The mint employee who processed this
coin back in 1696 somehow managed to make the piercing go directly through the
eye of Edward! You could argue
that he was perhaps mischievous and bored and did it intentionally, but the
punch has actually gone through the reverse side (that being the larger hole)
so he literally had no sight of the obverse king's eye... forgive the pun! What an amazing coincidence.
There were
problems, as one would perhaps expect with such a huge national
undertaking:
1. Due to the mint’s promise of a like-for-like
value replacement, regardless of condition, many enterprising individuals,
before submitting for exchange, clipped their hammered coinage further still,
retaining the silver shavings to be utilised for effectively what was free
money later on.
2. As a direct result of this extra clipping,
together with the high cost of minting the new milled coinage, the government
lost a great deal of money – nearly £3 million.
3. The timing was appalling – the new milled
money was not ready in time for an exchange.
Riots threatened and there was great public unrest until the government
bridged the period by issuing paper notes.
4. The infamous Window Tax, of which we’re all
still cognisant of today, was introduced specifically to pay for this near £3
million financial black hole. There have
been some bad government taxes over the years, but a window tax?!
Bearing in
mind there were not actually that many hammered coins that passed the grade in
1696 (the process was actually 1696-99), together with the fact that post 1699,
whenever a pierced hammered coin passed through the hands of officialdom, it
would inevitably be withdrawn, it’s perhaps easy to see why these coins are
rare. You really don’t see than many of
them. Georgian and Victorian gentlemen
collectors would not be interested in pierced coins (for goodness’ sake, these
were the people who mutilated the Cromwell crowns by smoothing over the
infamous die flaw because they couldn’t live with them as they were!!), which
is another reason why these extremely interesting coins are so rare. Find another like this!! £550 RESERVED (M.He.21-4-25 Lay-Away)
WTH-8139:
Edward VI
Hammered FINE Silver Sixpence; the Great Re-coinage of 1696! Fine silver issue of
1551-3, initial mark y, London mint, S.R. 2483. A pleasing example of
this attractive and sought after issue which is rarer than the shillings and,
just like the shillings, often presents as problematic - damaged, bent, worn
etc. Some damage is undoubtedly down to
a very sceptical public in 1550 who had lived through
50+ years of debased coinage thanks to Henry VIII. They would be disbelieving of these fine
silver coins and so would bite them and bend them to test they weren't
fakes. This coin is centrally pierced
but this was not a product of a wary public, rather it was pierced
intentionally at the mint, under the governance of Sir Isaac Newton himself, in
1696 at the Great Re-Coinage. Hammered
coinage in England was phased out at the restoration
of the monarchy in 1660 and was officially ended in 1662 with the introduction
of Charles II milled silver coins.
Whilst no more hammered coins were minted post 1662, the old hammered
coinage was still legal tender; hammered and milled running side by side,
although much of it was battered and bruised through shear over-usage, not to
mention seriously underweight through clipping.
In 1696, although hammered coinage was still popular with the public, it
was decided that enough was enough – all circulating hammered coinage was to be
assessed by the mint. Anything
substandard was to be exchanged for the new milled coinage and anything in high
enough grade and, most importantly, of the correct weight, was allowed to
circulate for a few years more. This
latter cohort was identified as “of still legal tender” by the addition of a central
punch or piercing administered by the mint.
There were problems, as one would perhaps expect with such a huge
national undertaking:
1. Due to the mint’s promise of a like-for-like
value replacement, regardless of condition, many enterprising individuals,
before submitting for exchange, clipped their hammered coinage further still,
retaining the silver shavings to be utilised for effectively what was free
money later on.
2. As a direct result of this extra clipping,
together with the high cost of minting the new milled coinage, the government
lost a great deal of money – nearly £3 million.
3. The timing was appalling – the new milled
money was not ready in time for an exchange.
Riots threatened and there was great public unrest until the government
bridged the period by issuing paper notes.
4. The infamous Window Tax, of which we’re all
still cognisant of today, was introduced specifically to pay for this near £3
million financial black hole. There have
been some bad government taxes over the years, but a window tax?!
Bearing in
mind there were not actually that many hammered coins that passed the grade in
1696 (the process was actually 1696-99), together with the fact that post 1699,
whenever a pierced hammered coin passed through the hands of officialdom, it
would inevitably be withdrawn, it’s perhaps easy to see why these coins are
rare. You really don’t see than many of
them. Georgian and Victorian gentlemen collectors
would not be interested in pierced coins (for goodness’ sake, these were the
people who mutilated the Cromwell crowns by smoothing over the infamous die
flaw because they couldn’t live with them as they were!!), which is another
reason why these extremely interesting coins are so rare. £550
WTH-9109:
Significant 1551
Edward VI Hammered Silver Sixpence. Third period, "Fine Silver" issue. London mint, S.R. 2483. Initial mark y so
one of the very first coins struck (circa 1551). This issue, coming on the back of decades of
Henry VIII coinage that didn't look like silver - and actually didn't contain
much silver - took the populace by surprise.
Many were suspicious at handling this unfamiliar looking coinage, often
biting and bending it to test the silver.
However, much more interesting than all that - this
coin is a rare survivor of the 1696 Great Recoinage. The Great Recoinage was the first part in a
two part process to remove all the old fashioned hammered coinage, most of it
clipped, worn and underweight, from British circulation. The entire point of a coin back then was that
the silver content represented the actual value, so a badly
clipped silver hammered penny was actually not worth a penny anymore in real
terms. Milled currency, featuring milled
edges as proof against clipping, had started some 30 years earlier at the start
of the Restoration. However, the earlier
hammered coinage had been around for many, many centuries and thus couldn’t be
removed overnight. In 1696, all hammered
currency had to be assessed. Coins that
were still “full weight, of a presentable nature, with a piercing that conforms
to the Act – central, no metal loss; signs of having been in circulation for at
least 50 years” (this last criteria presumably to protect against counterfeits),
were certified and allowed to circulate freely alongside the new milled coinage
post 1696. All other hammered coins were
removed from circulation by exchanging them for the new milled currency. The sting in the tail was that the old
hammered currency was exchanged by weight, not value! In actual fact, the majority of hammered
coinage was effectively withdrawn from circulation under this process. This was, however, only a temporary stay of
execution as under George II, just a few decades later,
all hammered coinage was removed from circulation and legally made
non-currency. There are no exact
surviving records of numbers for this process but it was generally considered
to be far from a success economically for the state. Many centrally pierced hammered coins
probably ended up melted down as later collectors probably assumed the hole was
merely damage, making these few survivors even rarer. Sixpences turn up less frequently than
shillings, especially in this VF grade.
That, coupled with the Great Recoinage association, makes this an
extremely important and desirable coin.
£445 RESERVED
(M.He.25-3-25 Lay-Away)
Provenance
ex Baldwin's
Groats
WTH-8158:
Edward VI (in the
name of Henry VIII) Hammered Billon Silver Groat. Henry VIII posthumous issue, 1547-51. Initial mark Grapple, Tower
(London) mint, S.R. 2403. Bust 4.
Billon issue of .333 silver. Even though this coin was struck very early
on in this period, it is still officially an Edward VI coin. Edward was but nine years old when he claimed
the throne in 1547. The images really do
this coin no favours whatsoever - it is a better coin in the hand. £475
Provenance:
ex Alan Cherry (his ticket)
Pennies
WTH-7645:
Edward VI Tudor
Hammered Silver Penny. Third
period, “very base issue” of 1551, in fact so much so that coinage from this
debased issue circulated at 50% face value.
York mint.
S.R. 2475. Wavy flan but in terms of
detail only, marginally better than the S.R.
plate coin. £225
WTH-8097: 1551 Edward VI
Hammered Billon Silver Penny. Initial mark Mullet. York mint. S.R. 2475. Above average for issue. £195
WTH-9235:
Edward VI
Hammered Silver PORTRAIT Penny.
Initial mark an Arrow obverse and reverse, Tower (London) mint, first period, April 1547 to
January 1549. S.R.
2460. Crowned
bust of the boy-king Edward VI facing right / shield over cross. Excellent legends for issue
both sides with clear initial marks, also both sides. Slightly wavy flan
otherwise nVF in grade which is most unusual for this
seldom-seen issue. Very rare.
£1,350
Provenance:
ex Spink